IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 01 September 2021 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BE93A03EB; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59kmnIvZzi7O; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBA93A1430; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 42AB51E2D4; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:09:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:09:10 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
Message-ID: <20210901150910.GH2820@pfrc.org>
References: <CA+RyBmUUbdsUz1=R=+Oq8K5uCVTHNUXA5P9ZMQ6qnnCEA_LgLA@mail.gmail.com> <5697_1630325964_612CCCCC_5697_162_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353E5905@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20210831213046.GD2820@pfrc.org> <25527_1630478925_612F224D_25527_493_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353E6E4D@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20210901123805.GF2820@pfrc.org> <22260_1630502464_612F7E40_22260_216_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353E71A2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <22260_1630502464_612F7E40_22260_216_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353E71A2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/bPvk0I20eM49YmAhzTXusZTJvYE>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:09:17 -0000

Med,

On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:21:03PM +0000, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> The IETF LC was actually closed since 2021-08-06. 
> 
> Even if the IETF LC is closed, the current BFD comments will be part of the comments we will be addressing in the next iteration. For your record, we have already recorded the name alignment fix, the missing default clause, holdtime explanation, and session type indication. 
> 
> If there are any other comments, please let us know. 

That's what I get for not reviewing the datatracker.  

I'll flag this with your shepherding AD.  Thanks.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email