[Errata Rejected] RFC7880 (5211)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 14 March 2018 19:38 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75087126DED; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7rZ0IGkSS1Hn; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77916124BE8; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CB9E3B81F67; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: gregimirsky@gmail.com, cpignata@cisco.com, wardd@cisco.com, nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com, manav@ionosnetworks.com, santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com
Subject: [Errata Rejected] RFC7880 (5211)
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180314193812.CB9E3B81F67@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:38:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/YU2SRS2dpCNCvqHnRnLJbQ4Fzek>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:26:31 -0700
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:38:14 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7880, "Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5211 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2017-12-16 Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- o bfd.SessionType: This is a new state variable that describes the type of a particular session. Allowable values for S-BFD sessions are: * SBFDInitiator - an S-BFD session on a network node that performs a continuity test to a target entity by sending S-BFD packets. * SBFDReflector - an S-BFD session on a network node that listens for incoming S-BFD Control packets to local entities and generates response S-BFD Control packets. The bfd.SessionType variable MUST be initialized to the appropriate type when an S-BFD session is created. Corrected Text -------------- o bfd.SessionType: This is a new state variable that describes the type of a particular session. Allowable values for S-BFD sessions are: * SBFDNone - indicates that the BFD session is not of S-BFD type. * SBFDInitiator - an S-BFD session on a network node that performs a continuity test to a target entity by sending S-BFD packets. * SBFDReflector - an S-BFD session on a network node that listens for incoming S-BFD Control packets to local entities and generates response S-BFD Control packets. The bfd.SessionType variable MUST be set to SBFDNone when a BFD session other than S-BFD. The bfd.SessionType variable MUST be initialized to the appropriate type when an S-BFD session is created. Notes ----- The original text leaves value of the new variable bfd.SessionType unspecified if the type of BFD session is other than S-BFD. --VERIFIER NOTES-- This report goes beyond pointing out an error in the document. If the changes are to me made (or discussed beyond the thread related to this report), it should be done through the normal WG channels. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/dI5Y2YXBG3kACEjX5vIZgSJHVw4 -------------------------------------- RFC7880 (draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Publication Date : July 2016 Author(s) : C. Pignataro, D. Ward, N. Akiya, M. Bhatia, S. Pallagatti Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7880 (5211) RFC Errata System