Re: BFD echo mode

David Ward <dward@cisco.com> Thu, 27 November 2008 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-bfd-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2C63A687E; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:46:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C1D3A687E for <rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:46:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5cOx9Ra4gyl for <rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC693A6832 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:46:01 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,675,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="29265945"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Nov 2008 15:45:56 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mARFjuIw026555; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:45:56 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mARFjuDl017216; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:45:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.52]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:45:56 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([171.68.225.134]) by xmb-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:45:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <F3F69139C275F848A1DB1518DC2C216806859108@xmb-sjc-22c.amer.cisco.com>
References: <77ead0ec0811260956u62e0e27aj66fbdba29453c5ad@mail.gmail.com> <F3F69139C275F848A1DB1518DC2C216806859108@xmb-sjc-22c.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <100B46D2-FC38-4E33-879A-61F0217CC83D@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: BFD echo mode
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:45:17 -0600
To: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <nobo@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2008 15:45:19.0585 (UTC) FILETIME=[26B3D510:01C950A7]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1478; t=1227800756; x=1228664756; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dward@cisco.com; z=From:=20David=20Ward=20<dward@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20BFD=20echo=20mode |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Nobo=20Akiya=20(nobo)=22=20<nobo@cisco.com>; bh=K/QE3kfPGiNI0b0b3rS679jg+6/OvwqZ1PPFtk3VxOo=; b=szhbdu1XeQgjDAEfwHHa+HqVnzUQGuisPfw+Z9f3u1fWar4HYJgCKh8mWr WWeaEYGyh37F/A/NAub9EhFxBXoGZaC6BHsrJFn3ajRt+pXAaSTYFFOPYowL wThM4V6ojh;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=dward@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Dave Katz <dkatz@juniper.net>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org

Nobo -

On Nov 27, 2008, at 3:41 AM, Nobo Akiya (nobo) wrote:

>
> Hello Vishwas.
>
> Couple of add-on comments, for single-hop.
>
>> Seeing some vendor documentation it seems they use a seperate
>> port for the echo mode - as the source and the destination
>> address.
>
> I hope vendors aren't using different udp dest port for echo packets.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-v4v6-1hop-08 Sec4.1.
>
> BFD Echo packets MUST be transmitted in UDP packets with destination
> UDP port 3785 in an IPv4 packet.
>
>> Can the asusmption that the echo mode packet is a BFD packet
>> be made (so the BFD source / dest packet identifiers can be
>> used)? The base BFD spec seems to state the content of the
>> packet need not be specified as the packet is just looped back.
>
> BFD echo packets can be identified by UDP dest port 3785.
> Data beyond UDP header is not specified, and that's left up to  
> vendors.
>
>> So I can see how we could look an IP packet in the case of
>> Single Hop (by having the MAC Destination Address of the
>> peer) but having IP address and destination the same (as of
>> the source).
>
> I don't think there's anything that specifies that dest & src  
> addresses
> must be the same. For dest addresses tho, it maybe easier to
> demultiplex if dest address is the outgoing interface.


DW: there is nothing in the spec that says the addrs have to be the  
same.


-DWard

>
> Thanx,
> Nobo
>