Re: S-BFD Use Cases Document Request

Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de> Mon, 17 November 2014 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <marc@sniff.de>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E971A0120 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:15:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.144
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cM4rPtodStbM for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from door.sniff.de (door.sniff.de [IPv6:2001:6f8:94f:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764B91A011F for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.sniff.de [127.0.0.1]) by door.sniff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF262AA0F; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:15:00 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:17:27 -0800
From: Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de>
To: Nobo Akiya <nobo@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20141116221727294771.761f1aac@sniff.de>
In-Reply-To: <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3943F52AE0F@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <CECE764681BE964CBE1DFF78F3CDD3943F52AE0F@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: S-BFD Use Cases Document Request
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.15
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/tyaMPIgrYjPWlhukqFr6pymQnzY
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:15:05 -0000

Hello Nobo et al.,

erm ... it's great to see so much energy and "drive" but can we discuss this 
a little bit further?

As I said in my reply, moving section 2 into the use-case document does make 
the alert-discrim draft less readable in my opinion.


Thanks & Regards,
Marc



On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:45:53 +0000, Nobo Akiya (nobo) wrote:
> Hi draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case Authors,
> 
> Number of WG members feel that it is appropriate to take following action.
> 
> 1) Take Section 2 from draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim-03, and 
> incorporate into draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.
> 2) Once (1) is done, remove Section 2 in 
> draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim and reference 
> draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.
> 3) Once (1) is done, attempt to progress draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case 
> document forward.
> 
> See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg02407.html for 
> email which initially stemmed this discussion.
> See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg02425.html for 
> email which converged the direction.
> 
> If Authors of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case have no objections, I'd like 
> to ask the Authors of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case to initiate the 
> changes for (1).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Nobo
>