IESG agenda for 2009-12-03 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Wed, 02 December 2009 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204A3A694A for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:24:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VC-Q2ko8I7Vp for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:24:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (unknown [206.197.161.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DE83A6997 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAUC03ka005909 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:00:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.net)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id nAUC033r005908 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:00:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:00:03 -0800
Message-Id: <200911301200.nAUC033r005908@runaway.fenron.net>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2009-12-03 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:24:44 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-12-03). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat OUTSTANDING TASKS Last updated: November 23, 2009 IP o Magnus Westerlund to draft an IESG Statement on BCP 32. IP o Lisa Dusseault to investigate the request to add a new Atom Link Relation type for the PubSubHubbub protocol and report back at the next telechat (December 3, 2009). If the requesters do not respond, IANA advises to let it go as neither Lisa or IANA have gotten a response. IP o Lars Eggert and Ron Bonica to propose text for determining when one document updates another. IP o Jari Arkko to find an expert for eapsimaka-numbers (RFC 4187) [IANA #276892]. 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date SEC Nov 30 Using GSS-API Mechanisms in SASL: The GS2 Mechanism Family (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Alexey Melnikov (alexey.melnikov@isode.com) is the document shepherd Token: Pasi Eronen TSV Nov 30 Support for RSVP in Layer 3 VPNs (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] IPR: * Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-00 Token: Magnus Westerlund Was deferred by Adrian Farrel on 2009-11-16 RTG Nov 28 Authentication and Confidentiality in PIM-SM Link-local Messages (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document shepherd is Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Token: Adrian Farrel RTG Nov 28 Support of address families in OSPFv3 (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG Nov 28 Advertising a Router's Local Addresses in OSPF TE Extensions (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Acee Lindem (acee@redback.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ross Callon RTG Nov 28 Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamic Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-10 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Lou Berger (lberger@labn.net) is the document shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel INT Nov 28 Transmission of IPv4 packets over IEEE 802.16's IP Convergence Sublayer (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-16ng-ipv4-over-802-dot-16-ipcs-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Gabriel Montenegro (g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date APP Nov 28 PATCH Method for HTTP (Proposed Standard) draft-dusseault-http-patch-16 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> agreed to be the document shepherd. Token: Alexey Melnikov APP Nov 28 FTP Extension Registry (Proposed Standard) draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> is the document shepherd. Token: Alexey Melnikov APP Nov 28 Defining Well-Known URIs (Proposed Standard) draft-nottingham-site-meta-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault APP Nov 28 IMAP4 Keyword Registry (Proposed Standard) draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> is the document shepherd. Token: Lisa Dusseault 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date INT Nov 28 Securing Neighbor Discovery Proxy Problem Statement (Informational) draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: The document shepherd is Marcelo Bagnulo (marcelo@it.uc3m.es) Token: Ralph Droms INT Nov 28 Basic Socket Interface Extensions for Host Identity Protocol (HIP) (Experimental) draft-ietf-hip-native-api-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Gonzalo Camarillo (Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date INT Nov 28 The SatLabs Group DVB-RCS MIB (Informational) draft-combes-ipdvb-mib-rcs-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd is Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Token: Jari Arkko APP Nov 28 RFC 2731 ("Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML") is Obsolete (Informational) draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com> is the document shepherd. RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an AD sponsored document. Token: Alexey Melnikov APP Nov 28 The OAuth Core 1.0 Protocol (Informational) draft-hammer-oauth-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date INT Nov 28 4over6 Transit Solution using IP Encapsulation and MP-BGP Extensions (Experimental) draft-wu-softwire-4over6-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ralph Droms 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date APP Nov 19 HTTP State Management Mechanism (httpstate) Token: Lisa 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 RIM IPR disclosure and application/3gpp-ims+xml media type registration (Alexey Melnikov) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2009-12-03 telechat. Bill Fenner