IESG agenda for 2010-01-07 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 04 January 2010 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E102A3A67F3 for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -87.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-87.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=10.357, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sp7fjxW9tFWk for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (unknown [206.197.161.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21C03A63D3 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:01:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o04C0Xnt088410 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:00:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.net)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id o04C0XmE088409 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:00:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:00:33 -0800
Message-Id: <201001041200.o04C0XmE088409@runaway.fenron.net>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2010-01-07 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:01:09 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2010-01-07). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of Past Telechats 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat OUTSTANDING TASKS Last updated: December 7, 2009 IP o Magnus Westerlund to draft an IESG Statement on BCP 32. IP o Lars Eggert and Ron Bonica to propose text for determining when one document updates another. 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items Area Date RTG Jan 03 A set of monitoring tools for Path Computation Element based Architecture (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Julien Meuric (julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com) is the new document shepherd Token: Adrian Farrel APP Jan 02 Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-12 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault APP Jan 02 Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-idnabis-protocol-17 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault APP Jan 02 Right-to-left scripts for IDNA (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault APP Jan 02 The Unicode code points and IDNA (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-idnabis-tables-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault TSV Jan 03 RTP Payload Format for 1-D Interleaved Parity FEC (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-fecframe-interleaved-fec-scheme-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> is the document shepherd. Token: Magnus Westerlund SEC Jan 03 ESSCertIDv2 update for RFC 3161 (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3161-update-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Steve Kent is the document shepherd <kent@bbn.com> Token: Tim Polk 2.1.2 Returning Items Area Date TSV Jan 03 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Extensions for Admission Priority (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-14 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Gorry Fairhurst (gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk) is the document shepherd Token: Magnus Westerlund RTG Dec 28 Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] IPR: * Juniper's Statement of IPR related to draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-07 * Yakov Rekhter's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-08 belonging to Cisco Systems Token: Ross Callon 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items Area Date OPS Jan 02 IANA Considerations for Network Layer Protocol Identifiers (BCP) draft-eastlake-nlpid-iana-considerations-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu INT Jan 03 Definition of Master Key between PANA Client and Enforcement Point (Proposed Standard) draft-ohba-pana-pemk-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko 2.2.2 Returning Items Area Date INT Jan 03 Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification (Proposed Standard) draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: There is no document shepherd IPR: * Juniper's Statement of IPR related to draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-06 Token: Jari Arkko 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Items Area Date TSV Jan 04 Framework for Metric Composition (Informational) draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document shepherd is Henk Uijterwaal (henk@ripe.net) Token: Lars Eggert APP Jan 02 Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Background, Explanation, and Rationale (Informational) draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-15 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault TSV Jan 03 Guidelines for Implementing DVB-IPTV Application-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection (Informational) draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Greg Shepherd (gjshep@gmail.com) is the document shepherd. IPR: * QUALCOMM Incorporated's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec-02 Token: Magnus Westerlund RTG Jan 03 Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Ethernet Label Switching Architecture and Framework (Informational) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-arch-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Deborah Brungard (db3546@att.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Items Area Date INT Jan 03 IEEE 802.21 Basic Schema (Informational) draft-ohba-802dot21-basic-schema-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: There is no document shepherd Token: Jari Arkko INT Jan 03 The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition (Experimental) draft-xli-behave-ivi-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd is Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Token: Jari Arkko GEN Dec 28 Certified Electronic Mail (Informational) draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-05 [txt] Note: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> is the document shepherd. Token: Tim Polk 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Items Area Date GEN Jan 01 GOST R 34.10-2001 digital signature algorithm (Informational) draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost34102001-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley GEN Jan 01 GOST R 34.11-94 Hash function algorithm (Informational) draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost341194-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley GEN Jan 01 GOST 28147-89 encryption, decryption and MAC algorithms (Informational) draft-dolmatov-cryptocom-gost2814789-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2010-01-07 telechat. Bill Fenner