IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-16

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9F112E957; Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wBhdl25mzsKi; Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4141612E8EF; Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q2-v6so20442224lfc.12; Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b69JAeC3xOhi69Sk1Qwan5auFKKzHI/6dBAPQkigQ+o=; b=b3aV53TMkSkKuOEouFHLCiYUPZDaVc19aTHBBDI8vz2ZNCeff+1cb+AtqXuYDnYuOU YWvdKVJlYv1fIBeMQ6sSeUvleaHFcJ3Von5aWKJvZiGlzFsT5hEaIDvLgshHnLMlagGx vccnXiuFH0cnYujff5wubsNA7KuE1XOChTgwGQ3lnB//izDNH+rvK6jJy02SXTWuvl1K sdcgSm5aNvgG1d9NnhE/aTbhwfuv7UMCgTyNaO8iMLKAVtOXLrI3wnquHnlZW+gNkMOF 9La15qwg3+ZMgIHyUpWPwezcLhgea8Tty4FytchKVIqXHeLCrJtFetg3JncmcCasBlRn lPpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b69JAeC3xOhi69Sk1Qwan5auFKKzHI/6dBAPQkigQ+o=; b=R97rtfU7zlBD8J0ZpZUQAL2FW8i8MlxLdVKBxxUmg6yJ42bcesu0shQwlreTQ5wkJL v+pGJ7CSoUBa0lR0lAttUbfYvKN+w2jUkQ7ymjPsbB5XB5hko2UBilLskbrcIUOnGBWB aczchChFqjDNsf2GPyHVKHE2ek4NugIbC7blgeIPHqaEyuBZyGHci7Lmvb009wsoQ1Hp SgqHTiDGp0DRyI2JgS3e5anQF6TxHzAWrc4cb06mNCgwwOkc7ANEx1nT9eAB0+RKCf5d BTjuXE6D2NWayuEaKoqE+tTPgtzF2IfwCHbfxmc0wTo4zZTIoW2CcQ601r0F5kCXjQlN JaTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwd/RJdyLK3xKFm3aV4zylIvK8NNApxGzxAu1meW7PtZLwmietPf WxyDCXvouWlGQ64WQ1h0rdSPrfH9FL/HhLRMWrQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqiOzVtU9Wk0fF5UJWhKY1zQ5IgoaBqwIqClgwXOH17PEAOH5M7c2FLyApQBkOpvCnrsPAT4u8oBd4wJE/0td8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:87d8:: with SMTP id v24-v6mr5502005ljj.69.1526339379441; Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.133.13 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <24738.1526338685@localhost>
References: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FCF003008@dggema521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <28935.1526166269@localhost> <CA+RyBmWKAfqvpRzrrBmpcJsebqmA+OXB_URfuizFh+k9UK_GgA@mail.gmail.com> <24738.1526338685@localhost>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:09:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmV3=p5_KRSRDWZXQ-48dFn8CvobXjD37UF66FO9BPBpqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint.all@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000084b5b5056c3294eb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/8Gwx4bynKMpIvQHQU2nbxkc83No>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-16
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:09:44 -0000

Hi Michael,
thank you for the most expedient response. Both updates are in the new
working version.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > The text that follows the first sentence in section 4.13.1 is the
>     > replacement of the entire section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880. Would stressing
> that
>     > make the relationship more clear, e.g.:
>
>     txt> The following procedure replaces the entire section 6.8.6 of
> [RFC5880].
>
>     > And the same can be applied to the first sentence in section 14.3.3:
>
>     txt> The following procedure replaces the entire section 6.8.7 of
> [RFC5880].
>
> That seems like good text.
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
> networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network
> architect  [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on
> rails    [
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email