IESG agenda for 2006-10-12 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 09 October 2006 11:03 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWsvO-0003Ae-Bf; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:03:58 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWsvO-0003AZ-0g for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:03:58 -0400
Received: from alnrmhc13.comcast.net ([206.18.177.53]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWsvK-0008Sy-J6 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:03:57 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20061009110343b1300l5073e>; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:03:53 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k99B0AaR004861 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k99B08sX004860 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:00:08 -0700
Message-Id: <200610091100.k99B08sX004860@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f0b5a4216bfa030ed8a6f68d1833f8ae
Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-10-12 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2006-10-12).
Updated 2:2:34 EDT, October 9, 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
1.5 Review of Projects
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of
8
Direct Data Placement over Reliable
Transports (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 8
draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-07.txt
Note: PROTO Shepherd: David Black
(Black_David@emc.com)
GEN-ART Reviewer: Francis Dupont
(Francis.Dupont@point6.net)
A Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol
Specification (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-07.txt
Token: Lars Eggert
TSV Marker PDU Aligned Framing for TCP
Specification (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 8
draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd: David Black
(black_david@emc.com)
Gen-ART Reviewer: Eric Gray
(Eric.Gray@marconi.com)
Token: Lars Eggert
OPS Operation of Anycast Services (BCP) - 3 of 8
draft-ietf-grow-anycast-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd: Geoff Huston
Token: David Kessens
The SDP (Session Description Protocol)
RAI Content Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 4 of
8
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-content-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO shepherd is Colin Perkins
Token: Cullen Jennings
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
TSV Direct Data Placement (DDP) Adaptation
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 8
draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd: David Black
(Black_David@emc.com)
Gen-ART Reviewer: Eric Gray
(Eric.Gray@marconi.com)
Token: Lars Eggert
TSV Aggregation of RSVP Reservations over MPLS TE
/DS-TE Tunnels (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 8
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Gen-ART Reviewer: Sharon Chisholm
(schishol@nortel.com)
Token: Magnus Westerlund
INT DNSSEC Experiments (Proposed Standard) - 7 of
8
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
INT SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation over Packet (CEP)
(Proposed Standard) - 8 of 8
draft-ietf-pwe3-sonet-13.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
Area Date
SEC RIPv2 Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-rja-ripv2-auth-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Back on the agenda to see if the latest
update includes all of the points in the
security considerations to clear Sam's DISCUSS
position.
Token: Russ Housley
GEN Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions (BCP) -
2 of 2
draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-02.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Sam Hartman
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
INT DNSSEC Opt-In (Experimental) - 1 of 6
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-09.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
Requirements for Multicast in L3
INT Provider-Provisioned VPNs (Informational) - 2
of 6
draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts-09.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
TSV Quick-Start for TCP and IP (Experimental) - 3
of 6
draft-ietf-tsvwg-quickstart-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: James Polk
(jmpolk@cisco.com)
Gen-ART Reviewer: Francis Dupont
(Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr)
Token: Lars Eggert
Structure-aware TDM Circuit Emulation Service
INT over Packet Switched Network (CESoPSN)
(Informational) - 4 of 6
draft-ietf-pwe3-cesopsn-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
INT TDM over IP (Informational) - 5 of 6
draft-ietf-pwe3-tdmoip-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
TSV QoS Signaling in a Nested Virtual Private
Network (Informational) - 6 of 6
draft-ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signaled-preemption-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
Security Implications of Using the Data
SEC Encryption Standard (DES) (Informational) -
1 of 1
draft-kelly-saag-des-implications-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
SEC Sep 22 Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
- 1 of 2
Token: Russ
SEC Sep 22 Handover Keying (hokey) - 2 of 2
Token: Russ
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 Sayre Appeal (Brian Carpenter)
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2006-10-12 telechat. Bill Fenner