IESG agenda for 2006-09-28 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 25 September 2006 11:02 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRoDx-0001qK-V9; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:02:09 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRoDw-0001qF-Ls for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:02:08 -0400
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([216.148.227.153]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRoDv-0008Mq-86 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:02:08 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-24-6-155-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.155.213]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060925110206m1300m1d01e>; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:02:06 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8PB1O2K078959 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:01:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8PB1Oqm078958 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:01:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:01:24 -0700
Message-Id: <200609251101.k8PB1Oqm078958@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 140baa79ca42e6b0e2b4504291346186
Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-09-28 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-09-28). Updated 18:2:21 EDT, September 22, 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 1.5 Review of Projects 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV GIST: General Internet Signaling Transport (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5 draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-11.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: WG Shepherd: John Loughney (john.loughney@nokia.com) Token: Magnus Westerlund OPS Operation of Anycast Services (BCP) - 2 of 5 draft-ietf-grow-anycast-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO Shepherd: Geoff Huston Token: David Kessens TSV Aggregation of RSVP Reservations over MPLS TE/ DS-TE Tunnels (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5 draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Gen-ART Reviewer: Sharon Chisholm (schishol@nortel.com) Token: Magnus Westerlund RTP Payload Format and File Storage Format for RAI the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) and Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) Audio Codecs (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-amr-bis-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Colin Perkins is PROTO Shepherd Token: Cullen Jennings SEC Oct 31 Secure Shell Public-Key Subsystem (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5 draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Requested comments be fixed by October 31 Token: Sam Hartman 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date SEC OCSP Extensions to IKEv2 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-myers-ikev2-ocsp-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) OPS over IEEE 802 Networks (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-schoenw-snmp-ether-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: version 02 was submitted by the document editor on 9/21 and should be used in the IESG discussion Token: Dan Romascanu 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date Framework and Requirements for Layer 1 RTG Virtual Private Networks (Informational) - 1 of 3 draft-ietf-l1vpn-framework-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon OPS Operational Security Current Practices (Informational) - 2 of 3 draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Ross Callon is the proto shepherd Token: David Kessens INT Softwire Problem Statement (Informational) - 3 of 3 draft-ietf-softwire-problem-statement-02.txt Note: Exiting Last Call on 9/28 Token: Mark Townsley 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date OPS Administration of the IANA Special Purpose Address Block (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-huston-ipv6-iana-specials-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu SEC OMA BCAST MIKEY General Extension Payload Specification (Informational) - 2 of 2 draft-dondeti-msec-mikey-genext-oma-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date OPS Sep 19 ADSL MIB (adslmib) - 1 of 1 Token: Dan 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date INT Sep 7 Mobility for IPv6 (mip6) - 1 of 1 Token: Jari 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Response to ITU-T SG-13 Liaison Statement (Lars Eggert) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2006-09-28 telechat. Bill Fenner