IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] [Sidrops] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying-01

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Tue, 18 December 2018 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1864C130F2C for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGUF98Pei6GY for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:3::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6033B130F25 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1gZIIW-000FcO-Jw (job@us.ntt.net) for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:32:45 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id f9so14388078eds.10 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYRY2jCt5aNhpt2LU4nm/ZV3gy5XrqYFpdgJi4puy2rYMXTlbHH GYvBhXVN994QPi0Wv3RLObPfgs/L0J4qMQEResalpQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XOG+lBpOrQ7pmLpwnVWBqTUYCLWlHUV9AWzx3vaaiXmZaQJn/L6BOhA5QhJHzOKaQcUCv6s52aGFnNXVkjkS0=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:a55c:: with SMTP id z28mr17022391edb.124.1545150762872; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:32:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn7Hs8FMg6_HPiDM22+g=boYVVKotkeB5+oq3FuRbmNzfw@mail.gmail.com> <687EE83A-5A88-4836-99E4-7425FE8FF964@sn3rd.com> <m25zvq94r0.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m25zvq94r0.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:32:31 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACWOCC9orM5Ym-0tr+oHc1nszzi5vass3i6w42q7r22K16VHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACWOCC9orM5Ym-0tr+oHc1nszzi5vass3i6w42q7r22K16VHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, rtg-ads@ietf.org, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/Qx2_IH4CKahlO6843QzOaApG_Mw>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] [Sidrops] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying-01
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:32:47 -0000

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:30 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> >>   - section 10
> >>     Does not parse -
> >>
> >>         ..employees that no longer need access to a
> >>         routers SHOULD be removed the router to ensure only those authorized
> >>         have access to a router.
> >
> > How about:
> >
> >    employees that no longer need access to a router SHOULD
> >    have their access rights removed for that router to ensure only
> >    those authorized for that router have access.
>
> why are we going into ops practice which is not directly relevant?

I'd just remove the section about employees, this seems to be going a
bit into the weeds.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email