IESG agenda for 2007-10-18 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 15 October 2007 11:07 UTC
Return-path: <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhNms-0007bu-Pd; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:07:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhNmr-0007b3-NH for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:07:05 -0400
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([216.148.227.153]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhNml-0004Bn-E1 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:07:05 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20071015110643m1300og04le>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:06:43 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l9FB099I014423 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l9FB09EX014422 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:00:09 -0700
Message-Id: <200710151100.l9FB09EX014422@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 17bdfcaea25d1444baef0e24abc38874
Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-10-18 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2007-10-18).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Signaling MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom
OPS Mar 10 Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs) (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 5
draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-signaling-15.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: Jean Francois Mule is the PROTO SHEPHERD
of the document
Token: Dan Romascanu
Extended Secure RTP Profile for RTCP-based
RAI Feedback (RTP/SAVPF) (Proposed Standard) - 2
of 5
draft-ietf-avt-profile-savpf-11.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: PROTO shepherd is Colin
Token: Cullen Jennings
A Domain Availability Check (dchk) Registry
APP Type for the Internet Registry Information
Service (IRIS) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5
draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dchk-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: April Marine is Document Shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
APP IMAP4 Extensions for Quick Mailbox
Resynchronization (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5
draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Chris Newman
TSV MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol (Proposed
Standard) - 5 of 5
draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib-02.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Shepherd by responsible AD: Magnus
Westerlund
Token: Magnus Westerlund
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman
Token: Jari Arkko
Requesting Answering Modes for the Session
RAI Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard)
- 2 of 2
draft-ietf-sip-answermode-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Keith is shepherd.
Token: Cullen Jennings
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
GEN Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations
Section in RFCs (BCP) - 1 of 1
draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-08.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV Defining Network Capacity (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-ietf-ippm-bw-capacity-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Matt Zekauskas
(matt@internet2.edu)
Token: Lars Eggert
TSV NFS RDMA Problem Statement (Informational) - 2 of
3
draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler
(spencer.shepler@sun.com)
Token: Lars Eggert
Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote
OPS Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)
(Informational) - 3 of 3
draft-ietf-radext-rfc3576bis-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT EAP-IKEv2 Method (Experimental) - 1 of 2
draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: There is no Document Shepherd.
Another doc to take back to telechat
Token: Jari Arkko
Experiment in Study Group Formation within
GEN the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
(Experimental) - 2 of 2
draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: No document shepherd.
Need to bring this back to the telechat
Token: Jari Arkko
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot
positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments
will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
APP Sep 25 HyperText Transport Protocol Bis
(httpbis) - 1 of 1
Token: Lisa
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
Area Date
RTG Oct 11 Common Control and Measurement
Plane (ccamp) - 1 of 2
Token: Ross
RAI Oct 9 Audio/Video Transport (avt) - 2 of
2
Token: Cullen
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
INT Sep 23 Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) -
1 of 2
Token: Jari
TSV Sep 27 Network File System Version 4
(nfsv4) - 2 of 2
Token: Lars
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 ion-2026-practice.html (Russ Housley)
6.2 On Appeals of IESG and Area Director Actions and Decisions (Russ
Housley)
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2007-10-18 telechat. Bill Fenner