IESG agenda for 2007-10-04 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 01 October 2007 11:06 UTC
Return-path: <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcJ6q-0006DW-PV; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:06:44 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcJ6o-00069T-Sc for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:06:42 -0400
Received: from alnrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.225.93]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcJ6o-0008TP-4Z for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:06:42 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20071001110641b130009st8e>; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:06:41 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l91B09YQ058760 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l91B090H058759 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:00:09 -0700
Message-Id: <200710011100.l91B090H058759@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1924de3f9fb68e58c31920136007eb1
Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-10-04 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2007-10-04).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
OPS Overview of the Internet Multicast Routing
Architecture (BCP) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-mboned-routingarch-10.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
IS-IS Protocol Extensions for Path
RTG Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4
draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-isis-08.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
OPS Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in
Reflector Attacks (BCP) - 3 of 4
draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
INT Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in
IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4
draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Bob Hinden
<bob.hinden@nokia.com>
Token: Jari Arkko
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
Specification of the IPFIX Protocol for the
OPS Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: A previous version
draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt of this
draft was
already approved by the IESG. The IPFIX WG
decided to make changes to that
version of the document with the principal
goal of removing the SCTP
stream 0 restriction. Reviews should focus
on the changes since
draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt which are
mentioned in an editorial note
currently placed after the Table of
Contents.
Token: Dan Romascanu
INT Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3
draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman
Token: Jari Arkko
IP Multicast Requirements for a Network
TSV Address (and port) Translator (NAT) (BCP) -
3 of 3
draft-ietf-behave-multicast-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Magnus Westerlund is Proto Shepherd
Token: Magnus Westerlund
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
APP URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain
Media Type (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-wilde-text-fragment-08.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Chris Newman
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for
APP the Society of Motion Picture and Television
Engineers (SMPTE) (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-edwards-urn-smpte-02.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Chris Newman
INT EAP-IKEv2 Method (Experimental) - 2 of 3
draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: There is no Document Shepherd.
Note: LC expires Oct 9, I will take this to
the IESG 5 days before that
Token: Jari Arkko
Experiment in Study Group Formation within
GEN the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
(Experimental) - 3 of 3
draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: No document shepherd.
Note: LC Expires Oct 8, will take this to
IESG four days before that
Token: Jari Arkko
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the
IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot
positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments
will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
Area Date
APP Sep 25 HyperText Transport Protocol Bis
(httpbis) - 1 of 1
Token: Lisa
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
Area Date
INT Sep 23 Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) -
1 of 2
Token: Jari
TSV Sep 27 Network File System Version 4
(nfsv4) - 2 of 2
Token: Lars
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 IESG Statement about Appeals (Russ Housley)
6.2 Expert for RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-ipfix-info-15.txt [IANA #106002]
(Michelle Cotton)
6.3 ion-2026-practice.html (Russ Housley)
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2007-10-04 telechat. Bill Fenner