IESG agenda for 2007-09-20 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 17 September 2007 11:06 UTC
Return-path: <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXER5-0003N1-Tz; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:06:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXER4-0003Mw-N1 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:06:38 -0400
Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.225.91]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXER3-0000aU-Et for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:06:38 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070917110635b1100oeg49e>; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:06:35 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l8HB03Ax002689 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l8HB03b3002688 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:00:03 -0700
Message-Id: <200709171100.l8HB03b3002688@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b66a1e94d7d92973ece9e5da449ff80
Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-09-20 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2007-09-20).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Geolocation Policy: A Document Format for
RAI Expressing Privacy Preferences for Location
Information (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10
draft-ietf-geopriv-policy-12.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Robert Sparks is PROTO Shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
INT Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10
draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman
Token: Jari Arkko
ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the
RAI Extensible Provisioning Protocol (Proposed
Standard) - 3 of 10
draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-06.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
OPS IP Multicast MIB (Proposed Standard) - 4 of
10
draft-ietf-mboned-ip-mcast-mib-07.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
IGP Routing Protocol Extensions for Discovery
RTG of Traffic Engineering Node Capabilities
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10
draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
SEC Aug 1 Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type
(Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10
draft-ietf-smime-cms-auth-enveloped-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated
SEC Aug 1 Encryption in the Cryptographic Message
Syntax (CMS) (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 10
draft-ietf-smime-cms-aes-ccm-and-gcm-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
INT Mobility Header Home Agent Switch Message
(Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10
draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil
<Basavaraj.Patil@nsn.com>
Token: Jari Arkko
INT Mobile IPv6 Experimental Messages (Proposed
Standard) - 9 of 10
draft-ietf-mip6-experimental-messages-01.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil
<basavaraj.patil@nsn.com>
Token: Jari Arkko
INT Mobile IPv6 Vendor Specific Option (Proposed
Standard) - 10 of 10
draft-ietf-mip6-vsm-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil
<basavaraj.patil@nsn.com>
Token: Jari Arkko
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of
1
Protocol for Carrying Authentication for
Network Access (PANA) (Proposed Standard) - 1
of 1
draft-ietf-pana-pana-18.txt
Note: Returning for ballot by new ADs
Protocol for Carrying Authentication for
Network Access (PANA) Framework
(Informational)
draft-ietf-pana-framework-10.txt
Note: Returning for ballot by new ADs
Token: Mark Townsley
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
RAI Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session
Mobility (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot
positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments
will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
Area Date
GEN Media Server Markup Language (MSML)
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-saleem-msml-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: IESG Note: 3. The IESG thinks that
publication is harmful to the IETF work done
in the SPEECHSC WG and recommends not
publishing the document at this time.
Token: Jon Peterson
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
INT Aug 24 IPv6 Maintenance (6man) - 1 of
1
Token: Jari
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 Draft deadline for 00 WG drafts (Cullen Jennings)
6.2 Executive Session for Appeal (Russ Housley)
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2007-09-20 telechat. Bill Fenner