IESG agenda for 2007-09-06 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 03 September 2007 11:06 UTC
Return-path: <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IS9lO-0006Sd-73; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:06:38 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IS9lN-0006SX-5V for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:06:37 -0400
Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net ([216.148.227.155]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IS9lM-0006h6-BY for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:06:37 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070903110635m1500t6i73e>; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:06:35 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l83B09ol047860 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l83B09n6047859 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:00:09 -0700
Message-Id: <200709031100.l83B09n6047859@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 72dbfff5c6b8ad2b1b727c13be042129
Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-09-06 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-09-06). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date INT Using IPsec between Mobile and Correspondent IPv6 Nodes (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4 draft-ietf-mip6-cn-ipsec-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: AD Sponsored submission. There is no Document Shepherd. Token: Jari Arkko Inter domain Multiprotocol Label Switching RTG (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering - RSVP-TE extensions (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4 draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) RTG Allocations for the Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4 draft-ietf-manet-iana-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon INT IPv6 Router Advertisement Flags Option (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: No shepherd -- chairs are authors Token: Jari Arkko 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date Requesting Answering Modes for the Session RAI Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Keith is shepherd. Token: Cullen Jennings 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session SEC Resumption without Server-Side State (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-salowey-tls-rfc4507bis-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 2.2.2 Returning Item Area Date APP The Archived-At Message Header Field (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-duerst-archived-at-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> is document shepherd Token: Chris Newman 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date INT Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options Used by PXELINUX (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-dhc-pxelinux-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: NOTE: There are significant RFC Editor notes. Document Shepherd is Stig Venaas <stig.venaas@uninett.no> Token: Jari Arkko 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date GEN Bundle Protocol Specification (Experimental) - 1 of 1 draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-spec-10.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Proposed IESG Response: The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work. Token: Russ Housley 3.2.2 Returning Item Area Date SEC DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: The ballot has been split. Please revise DISCUSS and COMMENT text to address only this document. Token: Russ Housley 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3.3 For Action Area Date GEN Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-templin-rfc4214bis-04.txt Token: Mark Townsley 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date INT Aug 24 IPv6 Maintenance (6man) - 1 of 1 Token: Jari 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date INT Jul 31 DNS Extensions (dnsext) - 1 of 1 Token: Mark 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 IANA Ports allocation procedures (Cullen Jennings) 6.2 Expert for RFC 4422 [IANA #98946] (Michelle Cotton) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2007-09-06 telechat. Bill Fenner