Re: [RTG-DIR] REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection

Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> Sat, 29 August 2015 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510441B335D for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 03:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GU674mAmFcJX for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 03:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ENFIRHETS1.metaswitch.com (enfirhets1.metaswitch.com [192.91.191.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AC51B2B4D for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 03:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ENFIRHCAS1.datcon.co.uk (172.18.74.33) by ENFIRHETS1.metaswitch.com (172.18.209.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:47:33 +0100
Received: from ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::d5d5:c683:a3be:3a19]) by ENFIRHCAS1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::85a7:aa4e:2516:c2ad%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:47:44 +0100
From: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
To: "'rtg-dir@ietf.org'" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection
Thread-Index: AdDhsCSRlQrRGwKrQtSA5Vv5rjov3wAl/4Je
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:47:44 +0000
Message-ID: <krmnu490isbfrjhfcnd34ism.1440845257566@email.android.com>
References: <09CE6C3BE5E1EA40B987BF5F25D8DDBA0139CBACBB@ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <09CE6C3BE5E1EA40B987BF5F25D8DDBA0139CBACBB@ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_krmnu490isbfrjhfcnd34ism1440845257566emailandroidcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/jEjG9FVxVZERMqM2iUEZyZVbbqI>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] REVIEW NEEDED: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:47:54 -0000

Thanks to those who stepped forward - I have some volunteers now.
Cheers
Jon

Sent from my Xperia Z1 on O2


---- Jonathan Hardwick wrote ----

Dear routing directorate

I’m trying to find a reviewer for this draft.
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection-05.txt

The draft is in IETF last call, which ends on September 8, so we need to get a review pronto.

Is there a hero(ine) out there (excluding authors and MPLS chairs!) who can step up and provide a review?  We are not looking for deep expertise in mLDP – the review is from the point of view of technical readability and ease of understanding, so any of you should be able to do it.

Many thanks!
Jon