IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR] ULA issue [Re: Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-13]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 08 May 2018 03:00 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D418612D875; Mon, 7 May 2018 20:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SyrDSVejYXa; Mon, 7 May 2018 19:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22c.google.com (mail-pl0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CDE012D876; Mon, 7 May 2018 19:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v24-v6so1318806plo.3; Mon, 07 May 2018 19:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2hNFjazk6jGxYg6/MTd8DyczMntpHlm92ZyIZ45PVUM=; b=T4sUEc8m5OJTIcluCVPGS8RhqEC09ldWDWfTcs3uCnBp5Secr8GDeqlGkomljbTpv/ zMVVAyIDj3GMlCFAD4z6RDVcMOLvepzN5W9urZpjFBunptb6YoCktIzHRwJcgZZcsfk+ VGcGbx+1gjcnIS8pa4mtBXBPXv/1kvnX0/He/9HezM9Ogd/mUmzvnPKCofuVYFMGGcOu yotzH9oOiIOU2GQbRXQJoKmf9PoK4zpdaZTTm/R1e8CFZUPIyAfHkG6tSfrJ1mfK8EdY 8VmvafPz/3MB4tRU8g1bblbcjohtjfTEMBywNPyg6DCjMNCCy52Ur4fbfLC7S4RrLl6f uqMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2hNFjazk6jGxYg6/MTd8DyczMntpHlm92ZyIZ45PVUM=; b=n7PqaXKVuQh5gStpO1OrzB7DP0WOjOHqb5pqn3g9PQ253xzrKan+cE1A7KCAl1rDMS SwPFJmcWrlyvmZRyVKtk8CqjASOPXrF9IJo8rAaKPm0gcUYtGcZsDUDHzfMkP/K8c3cA rhKSg0PXMSg+3qdYCYZKkE5e1sTwhm2WZTmTzYo4HWg8RQx3UZFtSlY1kPCpxXID1Z7O PZzwp0JE5D1zk0KcDfK90YJ7yuPmfn5uyMQucL1IwiMP5YW9v1T1AIOX7H1WSqaWvBhZ qa67LBznURDMCSv7w5Kpf97XE50F2YB86BC0oWjeXdtmHvEjT6gEEn705XwBHXJnqAq3 cd1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tD9XLlcrretNZCzYjWITC+vNmCDjGzq8dT5Oolyv7R3wTz3Tfc8 Tr1u4bIbf5wdInhZhaWLrHbVmkp0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrReU4oL8jj6C40fxdJ5A6Z9ZpiUKE7Bxc6MSNb8Y3Axr3wv+fmag0SOejwJ+0MzGz57UhKhA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c81:: with SMTP id 1-v6mr39100545plt.126.1525748398221; Mon, 07 May 2018 19:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (65.21.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [123.255.21.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 204-v6sm36929343pgf.61.2018.05.07.19.59.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 May 2018 19:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane.all@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
References: <151995712572.15727.501156104518975926@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180507193019.nebavxqhv2jxkngt@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <ddcb5d2c-df2a-3cee-3484-9e9b5d61fbd9@joelhalpern.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <04e810ae-1233-f3ea-2773-d818abdedfe2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 14:59:53 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ddcb5d2c-df2a-3cee-3484-9e9b5d61fbd9@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/vJvNaD22orh-TG1B3sDM_TQ9y1o>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] ULA issue [Re: Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-13]
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 03:00:01 -0000

CCs trimmed:

On 08/05/2018 11:05, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
...
>>
>>>      I presume there is not an assumption that all ULA addressed communicating
>>>      with a node which supports the ACP will be over the ACP.  As I understand
>>>      it, ULAs may well have other uses outside of ANIMA / the ACP.  Which leads
>>>      to a question about how the text in 6.1.3 "If the CDP URL uses an IPv6 ULA,
>>>      the ACP node will try to reach it via the ACP." is expected to be supported?

I guess I read that sentence as simply meaning:
"If the CDP URL uses an IPv6 ULA within the ACP's ULA prefix,
the ACP node will try to reach it via the ACP." which is a trivial
statement. If that's not what it means, I am confused too.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email