IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Added Hardware Friendly to Dallas slides

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Wed, 11 March 2015 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5A11A9045 for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rceo03N8ax6C for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824A81A8905 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.227.238] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t2B1KUiK011704 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:20:30 -0700
Message-ID: <54FF985E.2070608@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:20:30 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbDvAAS66xDCCg/o9RLHMYA1Rm3d88OmFl+bxQKJoG21ec+vBM5IfcLK4DeW2tFspGTPnAEIbM5uhzzAeh4vS8T
X-Sonic-ID: C;zNDRzozH5BGeZu8Jj30JFw== M;eKb1zozH5BGeZu8Jj30JFw==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/6guzyLEuLDrEWQb9kixsmLPP4I8>
Subject: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Added Hardware Friendly to Dallas slides
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:20:37 -0000

See
https://docs.google.com/a/aristanetworks.com/presentation/d/1r_LpKB0tV8VJVJx-t3h3NJagRCtIxqFXS8JesV9BCOo/edit?usp=sharing

First question is whether we agree on this summary (I did it from memory)
Second question is whether we should add the Hardware Friendly slide to 
the NVO3 slides for this Friday's presentation?
It might raise some discussion.

    Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email