Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] FW: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@arista.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@arista.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EFF1A905A for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nTE5sCScwYk for <rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390831A9061 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgep100 with SMTP id p100so18877288qge.3 for <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jzhayXvJ6jzwqpiOWp+J+m1EngFkKJ/ucITkrZP34eM=; b=PKSKNNkf/mAVMilflWSoGg4gqWvQQiozU4/6waIo/QvTjvQX6sT6I7rJVkdReqzRkb BcpTIfh71mdttZApfw1mD1O7Zw395jDxIdg1mxzZDNFxq8WMKaE1RHWyNBVVLT4jxy8m 9B9ig48xE4KsMARyFRhngIs4UBV7qhpqfPrCo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jzhayXvJ6jzwqpiOWp+J+m1EngFkKJ/ucITkrZP34eM=; b=M8cwHkhXo82DjosyjI8X4gvI7nwIXafu4RnPEQw5KNd4XLoAjh+TkRNkhKpj4cxZGf zrDA4IPUYT5onAJIwIo950jRWuChu0NoHD1/QAaLw3ktC4Ek2IAayZ3M1V1fgAq17lkZ Dm3kYslg6N2f68FInnWLipT1fAgzbGvXMCV6pE1cKIWnHj9ASQiZJbLsnCVTlqLSOhnW J/gc/yKs1ZpXn2shIDUJuaHzta5XV+2YqX2ZRnBOGz0J4OXoH13zFDsjJVTHZdWSYWcM weP8EG+V2godHsDYwgpZFgRaCL/cT3M7RGKPph1vV6XCmyCnLSMmsGEPyhGBRJtvOoVB Gsgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2ta9Zh/j+aCdRe7D0F9Lt/OjjXsyp3tvHGv8/0ysht4kbWenpsQuUloAB658awth3FQiX
X-Received: by 10.140.104.148 with SMTP id a20mr44073483qgf.89.1433435105351; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.242.126] ([162.210.130.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 68sm2624957qgk.9.2015.06.04.09.25.02 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55707BE5.2020902@arista.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:25:09 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@arista.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, "draft-rtg-dt-encap@tools.ietf.org" <draft-rtg-dt-encap@tools.ietf.org>
References: <D184F48F.9A0F0%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> <D19549B2.9B394%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <D19549B2.9B394%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/bw2K2_sCim31fB_0_dWmIyOkd94>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:06:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] FW: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:25:07 -0000

Sorry, I didn't see the paragraph for the authors in the request to the WG.

    Erik

On 6/4/15 12:20 AM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Please note - IPR statements are the mandatory part of the wg adoption
> process, please treat it accordingly.
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM
> To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
> Cc: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02
>
>> Hi RTGWG,
>>
>> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 as
>> working group document.
>>
>>
>> Please indicate support or no-support by June 8, 2015.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
>> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
>> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff & Chris
>>
>>