Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02

Jesse Gross <jgross@vmware.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jgross@vmware.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BB31ACC8D; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EBLSXa7ABo2B; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com [208.91.2.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20581ACC8C; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-mailhost1.vmware.com (sc9-mailhost1.vmware.com [10.113.161.71]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD2128EF5; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-CAS-013.vmware.com (EX13-CAS-013.vmware.com [10.113.191.65]) by sc9-mailhost1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA69E18090; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-MBX-010.vmware.com (10.113.191.30) by EX13-MBX-007.vmware.com (10.113.191.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:59:54 -0700
Received: from EX13-MBX-010.vmware.com ([fe80::c937:743c:749c:829b]) by EX13-MBX-010.vmware.com ([fe80::c937:743c:749c:829b%15]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:59:48 -0700
From: Jesse Gross <jgross@vmware.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02
Thread-Index: AQHQnxHGyiyD+5GUAkSK4dUupHLi/w==
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:59:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D1961828.106DA%jgross@vmware.com>
References: <D184F48F.9A0F0%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> <55707BD0.7030707@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <55707BD0.7030707@acm.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.113.160.246]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <5FBDAEAD016D904796B6202918480B31@pa-exch1.vmware.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/r51KexGIDW4RL66U3Qbnhp6flSQ>
Cc: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org" <Rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02
X-BeenThere: rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Design Team on Encapsulation Considerations discussion list <rtg-dt-encap-considerations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dt-encap-considerations/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dt-encap-considerations>, <mailto:rtg-dt-encap-considerations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:00:04 -0000

On 6/4/15, 9:24 AM, "Erik Nordmark" <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:

>On 5/22/15 2:58 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document
>>will
>> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
>>each
>> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>Sorry, I missed the above paragraph.
>
>I'm not aware of any relevant IPR on this document.

I¹m also not aware of any IPR relevant to this document.