Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 03 February 2018 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D58E12DA04; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8FCqGN1KzlD; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 11:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A28012D574; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 11:53:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15298; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517687583; x=1518897183; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=NP8tzrquaomJF9GMIdsrl2peYqS+q8xzzkcyLgdaqJQ=; b=lf1ecANQ/DopATh/H7kEkbl1vEptRxtjCjpTk2fDQXlYiMELeSy4yjPB wxta6ri2YRbwfj8uV4qyW2CBhUoEl3t1nRU0ZszdRam9FRM3o65l7ddOC LWxGxBO3vFTZNDwk1/frwoJ8goy/4PMdwRr1dYisEbFM3X/xs+raG287p A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DGAABDEnZa/4oNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJZeGZwKAqDW4okjiuBWyeJE4hghVWCGAojhRgCGoIeVBgBAQEBAQEBAQJrKIUjAQEBBCNmAgEIDgMDAQIrAgICHxEdCAIEARKJUUwDFRC7eoInhzINgTGCBgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFhGqCFYM/KQyCeYJrRAICAQGCDYJ3MYI0BYtuji+JSj4CiBeIUYUHgh6SGYsLgmJHiRUCERkBgTsBHzmBUHAVZwGCGwmEbniLFoEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.46,456,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="65864785"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2018 19:53:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w13Jr27U026594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 3 Feb 2018 19:53:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:53:01 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:53:01 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06
Thread-Index: AQHTj75s+jzn9gWK6UK/KHlYpLBHfqOTMbAA
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 19:53:01 +0000
Message-ID: <7BF88CDD-E123-4C43-9561-C3FE28640A71@cisco.com>
References: <CAG4d1rePDkwAQc0rc=mQLA3-y+0nwACRV6xbockmh2ggnumeTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rePDkwAQc0rc=mQLA3-y+0nwACRV6xbockmh2ggnumeTA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7BF88CDDE1234C439561C3FE28640A71ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/2m8oakuqIWUoDOn-3K31QsNSnzg>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 19:53:05 -0000

Hi Alia,

Thanks for the review.

From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 1:10 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org>
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <lberger@labn.net>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, Dean Bogdanovic <ivandean@gmail.com>, <xufeng_liu@jabil.com>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 1:10 PM

As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06.  First, I would like to thank the authors - Lou, Chris, Acee, and Dean - and those who have reviewed it for their work on this core document.

I am requesting IETF Last Call and have placed this on the IESG telechat for Feb 8.

I do have a few minor points below that should be fixed.

Minor:


  1.  Sec 3.1.2:  This example uses rt:routing-state and rt:routing in a pre-NMDA fashion.

Fixed.


  1.  Reference to RFC 7223 should be to draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bi<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis/>s.  References to RFC 7277 should be to draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis.

Yup – and RFC 8022Bis as well. I was hoping to have the RFC numbers for these but the revised-datastore draft is still in EDIT state and it is reference for everything else. I’ve updated all these and we’ll update them again when the BIS documents are published (all three are on the RFC Editor queue).


  1.  Revision dates in example schema mount in Sec 3.3 have dates for old versions instead of the bis drafts.

Fixed.

Thanks,
Acee

Regardsd,
Alia