Re: KRP ID Discussion.

[Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Stewart,

I hear what you are saying and politically speaking I understand your
comment. Not that I would agree - but this does not matter.

But just thinking on the technical level I do not understand it. Are you
saying that maybe in 2030 it would not be legally possible to create a link
of some form (physical or virtual) and run single IGP between US and Europe
? Or between EMEA and Japan ? Or EMEA to Africa ?

Are you saying that global operators would have to artificially divide
their networks into chunks ? And who would control what goes between such
chunks ? ITU-T ?

What about new zoo of satellites just launched to precisely offer Internet
without any geo boundaries ? Would we need to now map earth continents to
orbit and create "fences" in the space as well ?

Sorry but not only that would be end of the Internet but possibly end of
Google, MS, FB and other global operators and enterprises too. Or maybe the
idea is to kill open Internet and still allow enterprises to be global and
take most of the transit ?

Best,
R.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:02 PM Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Robert
>
> I make no comment on the draft, but whilst what you say is currently true,
> the state of world politics seem to make the current decoupling of the
> various topologies that we enjoy at the moment less likely to continue than
> was the case a few years back.
>
> The political actions of governments trumps (if you excuse the unfortunate
> pun) the preferences of the engineers and accountants.
>
> ITU-T SG2 (numbering) has a list of Middle East cases of traffic routing
> issues based on politics, the EU GDPR rules, the developing countries'
> concern over traffic patterns, the actions of the current US
> administration, all take us in the direction of the application of geo and
> political considerations to traffic routing.
>
> Regrettably, the writing is on the wall for restrictions to become
> normalised and built into the traffic planning rules, and that will push
> them into the routing system.
>
> Stewart
>
> > On 6 Aug 2020, at 10:15, Robert Raszuk <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Khaled,
> >
> > Physical network topologies do not follow geo nor political boundaries.
> Any solution based on the above is simply not practical.
> >
> > Best,
> > R.
>
>