IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-06.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 22 June 2017 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D193C1243F3 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xqsk0i1VU80K for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374F4127337 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1216; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498137247; x=1499346847; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4wdkXh6g2zsg9C8iWXSZVDXsQMFJssp4CUKi5d+vkDE=; b=H7NZtp8jU8ombjKg/l/0+3G1uhnzbq+74tgn/GPisgjA8aXVh/9rjUvN +tNkO60kj5S1ZhJMeNUgbt/X8pID7C2LPLVvecPq80JEpjiU4nXrujZjf u9A7rz3DFvdvyveZ0TghpzTQiBLiQrR6hSSjO7kNxhTb5tx0pEgWAfGv4 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DjAABywUtZ/5JdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1iBbweDZYoZkWCVeIIRhiQCGoJlPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQUjEUUQAgEIDgoCAiYCAgIwFRACBA4FiiyrfYImi2YBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQuCHIgcNId9gmEBBJ5jApNgkg+VFQEfOIEKdBWHWHaHICuBBYENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,373,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="259284689"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jun 2017 13:14:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5MDE6qb025271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:14:06 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:14:05 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:14:05 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
CC: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-06.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHS6fnikS0I7ilFJE6n2lpEnZm8QqIuZSiAgAAFDoCAAV4qAIAASyqA//+/ZgCAAIVuAIAAhoEA
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:14:05 +0000
Message-ID: <D5713A41.B6239%acee@cisco.com>
References: <149736763440.7477.10138004135435824433@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170620192616.GB2289@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ER=SnJCu+BTpPKs+oOd0sAuPKTM1NCN4h9rYWBh=aX9feA@mail.gmail.com> <20170620194357.GD2289@pfrc.org> <D5704EFC.B617C%acee@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERnpTGYzoZ_vqr=6hZy7E51tsJPLf6k+6=P-2Rmuxjesiw@mail.gmail.com> <D5705923.B61A1%acee@cisco.com> <20170622011236.GK2289@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170622011236.GK2289@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2C8C0462CF68184E84BDE70463ACED8A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/9UynZhruB_YjgCqAgMonOZYvPnI>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:14:09 -0000

Hi Jeff, 

On 6/21/17, 9:12 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

>Acee,
>
>Just so I have your intent right:
>
>On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:15:07PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> Feel free to suggest validated common YANG typedefs for consideration
>>by the Routing Design Team…. I’m not worried about adding needed types
>>for a few more weeks. It is the few more quarters that I’m worried
>>about. This is also consistent with the direction we are receiving from
>>the ADs.
>
>Are you saying that for the issues that have been raised about the
>route-target type (existing) that no action will happen without getting
>supplied a diff?

Yes - I’ll add the site-of-origin, ipv6-site-of-origin, and
ipv6-route-target types. I’ll also look at the geo-location as suggested
by Robert and come back on the outcome.

Thanks,
Acee

>
>-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email