IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-06.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 22 June 2017 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAB91273E2 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2s4l_5X3_JlF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99EB11242F7 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m62so46491376itc.0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=tJhcMALSAOAqfMXPIqAUdKOnr+MdrIIYrvF/h+w0em8=; b=Kx5q0g6lRfx/xle+m1bCu6v2MVTJjY/7LKJb5GP4G8arnXjfXjDTFZokht6gY2SwMM ZEwTTxs9k3HJ/BY8Rp/PrLU14W29PyYF5jIb32ujQtzArIr945Ud7UUy2VypWeainsI9 Y/FjXkoDcLvHa89vFO61sSPN3vjarH8nNdUwXng5OlymZahL3Br/KhgYAuHSTqARSRW5 bcSCxuQAni38QDYAkzTXZK17kE4FaJdYq2RzzWf9vd9qD4O04ne+Pe2kebdrivcitSAc XWPVyIT1IcbQ9z4Apgc6dDitpXDA7wEVf9qIpytTwi5EiM99+6faHOto5wdpguaXoyRq 64Gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tJhcMALSAOAqfMXPIqAUdKOnr+MdrIIYrvF/h+w0em8=; b=cYuymc+9fCS2i3wnEbabFsYkrELbXTNBKVINy8ytey6L+FaSDWuF+SPwOWo5l9d53F I9MGyXp8uCzF3ZWRy0WfkKuRDtSc52tME78qR+igfU/19Mw/dJKJ+xGBrfBOiWIwFzuk AmRMbf3fB/ikaedK6dBpjhJu8rxQ+owVhZRlcRHls08rvVy15I1FKt17FG9MQbwnrdXD vV3y8n1eIXpsLU7H+leHJ3Eh/8d9iqpWnQIK0EHcB603aV4FS94mdqxSAesgGUbTzmxD 2bAGqQZzSKPhpO4k0Z9P3HhlD7LLfBoHXg+pKLdrSzqbMj3u3FD9j0ut7AUwr1vsCWfS qG3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxajQxdn1XbdSKsw8d3zescSmB/EZAQtL1zpejOvPZ1/4Oz96TB rNW/WAvzEjmYCF+GPlsSgg4jvU2/2g==
X-Received: by 10.36.29.6 with SMTP id 6mr839738itj.59.1498119990933; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.32.15 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D5707A54.B61D3%acee@cisco.com>
References: <149736763440.7477.10138004135435824433@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170620192616.GB2289@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ER=SnJCu+BTpPKs+oOd0sAuPKTM1NCN4h9rYWBh=aX9feA@mail.gmail.com> <20170620194357.GD2289@pfrc.org> <D5704EFC.B617C%acee@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERnpTGYzoZ_vqr=6hZy7E51tsJPLf6k+6=P-2Rmuxjesiw@mail.gmail.com> <D5705923.B61A1%acee@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERkzFJyz9_1_RYY-x+QpZbkLb7oYJFB8W4QNxeTm68Xugg@mail.gmail.com> <D5705CF3.B61B3%acee@cisco.com> <CA+b+ER=spwoY_=FFzVODgCiQM65QhoN3jx=kE_rciAJJgpE1rg@mail.gmail.com> <D5707A54.B61D3%acee@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:26:30 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4wqNALPuV6Qjsc5riyrexLrapjw
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmEkEBPs+WDq0kn7vqA=y9ACn_kZZ_12k5k8w+zkwOjBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-06.txt
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143e132e3fefe0552883d61"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ylfUP3FcTHgcf38-9dS4ZJJ72Kk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:26:33 -0000

Acee,

Also isn't MD5 / TCP-AO or security certificates common across multiple
> routing components ?
>
> Videre RFC 8177…
>


​I was under assumption that this work aims at providing a comprehensive
​reference to common (used across protocols) elements either by defining
them directly or providing references if they were already defined
elsewhere.

Apparently the latter part is missing from this document.

You have IPX address family and you do not have RIP one which was way more
> common over PE-CE then IPX :) ?
>
> RIP is not an address family, RIPv2 advertises AFs IPv4 and IPv6 (at least
> that is all I’ve ever implemented)….
>


​Oh please ... It seemed obvious especially in this context. It is like
mocking from someone who said "BGP" in the context of multi-protocol
extensions rather then spelling BGPv4 each time.

Thx,
R.​

​​

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email