Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 13 February 2018 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5675512EA9E; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:34:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WkNoD8p_HXmy; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2DE12EA9D; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w1DIYHnX077687 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:34:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com" <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <151806747640.17184.1735281072604280039.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <465AE72F-858F-4FA2-BB40-616D7FAEF61B@cisco.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <971e163c-7683-911b-c400-1c3a5cfab1bf@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:34:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <465AE72F-858F-4FA2-BB40-616D7FAEF61B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/BI_RFg7nLb9OxDLo9wYMz2tsKtE>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:34:27 -0000

Looks good. Thanks!

/a

On 2/13/18 11:10 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> The -10 version includes IPv6 addresses in the examples.  Note that OSPF router-ids and area-ids are represented in dotted-quad format but are not necessarily IPv4 addresses (although it is common for the unique router-id to be based on an IPv4 loopback address).
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 2/8/18, 12:25 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Adam Roach" <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>      Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
>      draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: No Objection
>      
>      When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>      email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>      introductory paragraph, however.)
>      
>      
>      Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>      for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>      
>      
>      The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/
>      
>      
>      
>      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>      COMMENT:
>      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>      
>      All of the examples in §B.1 use IPv4 addresses exclusively. Please update these
>      to use all-IPv6 or a mix of IPv4 and IPv6. See
>      <https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/> for details.
>      
>      
>      _______________________________________________
>      rtgwg mailing list
>      rtgwg@ietf.org
>      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>      
>