Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <> Tue, 13 February 2018 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEDA12D84C; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a52qaT0_rN5N; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327F2126CE8; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:10:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=2194; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518541835; x=1519751435; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=izZ4e9tovukebNTZw1YjxFtj1TJZKPkb5O8lul9agnc=; b=MkRHnyMrS79kItI9naFw73heVuX6SPiNgbPkpDMdMqP+qGGRRmN71eB6 24HjaZb+6YRZNTsRkqwUKvZr2Kbich8k4Ex9zwd065PHoyHYFptDBi59r 0OfAkXL40bNWoFSyOeOGTPOlnbi4DWib5wpx4kw6k0LeUGJs0YHeugH9n c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,508,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="353720368"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2018 17:10:20 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1DHAK2k007324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:10:20 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:10:19 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:10:19 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>
To: Adam Roach <>, The IESG <>
CC: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHToJ0rF+pPJRGZ20Gg1AzE1vwByqOimdKA
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:10:19 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:10:37 -0000

Hi Adam, 
The -10 version includes IPv6 addresses in the examples.  Note that OSPF router-ids and area-ids are represented in dotted-quad format but are not necessarily IPv4 addresses (although it is common for the unique router-id to be based on an IPv4 loopback address). 

On 2/8/18, 12:25 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Adam Roach" < on behalf of> wrote:

    Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: No Objection
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    Please refer to
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    All of the examples in §B.1 use IPv4 addresses exclusively. Please update these
    to use all-IPv6 or a mix of IPv4 and IPv6. See
    <> for details.
    rtgwg mailing list