Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03.txt
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 24 February 2016 02:40 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB811B3AF6 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:40:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iKVoYfqZK-Cr for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 367921B3A58 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 30791 invoked by uid 0); 24 Feb 2016 02:40:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2016 02:40:36 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id N9gV1s00j2SSUrH019gYjW; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:40:33 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GOWbTI9K c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=jFJIQSaiL_oA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=vxtsQUyxHT8Nuch2A6IA:9 a=4gg4L7XzfoXcKXWJ:21 a=_-FwKM5Wv9Nzml_x:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=jO5m9I1TzjoA:10 a=jM_x9b4JT8QA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:To:References:Subject; bh=VgcCccBH+zwswgMeZtydTpn6k9ZOYOAbvTKqRJb2JKk=; b=iS+2Rc7gjWlHb72B1IjmIdgAxQkjo7Ha0w1VfzlBsD6PpzYjfqaNM40BESN4CxA3/cUS4D+lgrktLwTGyChGfPvcwz2lNUXaQhQ3nvfxdKAIRKgRDddI04aVSZedH1Y4;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:41549 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1aYPNQ-0003NB-4k; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:40:32 -0700
Subject: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03.txt
References: <20160224022951.24025.69591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160224022951.24025.69591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <56CD181B.3040307@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:40:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160224022951.24025.69591.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/FoGZGD4G7c2Nz6KAsS7LiGrK8Vc>
Cc: Routing Area YANG Architecture DT <rtg-dt-yang-arch@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:40:39 -0000
Hello, This draft has been updated to use an emerging yang capability called 'schema-mount' [1] which translates to a significant simplification. To quote the draft: Schema Mount enables a dramatic simplification of the presented device model, particularly for "lower-end" devices which are unlikely to support multiple network instances or logical network elements. Should structural-mount/YSDL not be available, the more explicit tree structure presented in earlier versions of this document will need to be utilized. As it looks like there will soon be a netmod WG draft on schema mount, we think it's time to ask the WG to consider adopting our draft as a RTG WG draft. [1] There was a netmod interim on schema mount on Monday, see http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 Our slides from that meeting are available at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/22/netmod/slides/slides-interim-2016-netmod-1-1.pptx and it gives a brief overview of the current draft. Lou (and co-authors) -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03.txt Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:29:51 -0800 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Network Device YANG Organizational Models Authors : Acee Lindem Lou Berger Dean Bogdanovic Christan Hopps Filename : draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03.txt Pages : 36 Date : 2016-02-23 Abstract: This document presents an approach for organizing YANG models in a comprehensive structure that may be used to configure and operate network devices. The structure is itself represented as a YANG model, with all of the related component models logically organized in a way that is operationally intuitive, but this model is not expected to be implemented. The identified component modules are expected to be defined and implemented on common network devices. This document also defines two modules that can be used to model the logical and virtual resource representations that may be present on a network device. Examples of common industry terms for logical resource representations are Logical Systems or Routers. Examples of of common industry terms for virtual resource representations are Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances and Virtual Switch Instances (VSIs). This document is derived from work submitted to the IETF by members of the informal OpenConfig working group of network operators and is a product of the Routing Area YANG Architecture design team. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
- Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-mod… Lou Berger
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtg… Lou Berger
- FW: [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtg… Acee Lindem (acee)
- RE: [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtg… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rtg… Lou Berger
- Re: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-mode… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] I-D Action: draft-rtgyangd… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Rtg-dt-yang-arch] I-D Action: draft-rtgyangd… Loa Andersson