Re: Q&A at Microphone on GRPC
Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 22:10 UTC
Return-Path: <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D56D12D9F0 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0V1sOHXYAlF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com (mail-vk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B3B12B078 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n129so87803606vke.3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iFcV4Njy0R2JGK7Il5GSkREvKgDyw42IO3hHZ6LSwG4=; b=CFAI0+Qeg6muKYGOCjYmxcc2nD9WjkteiiR+5UsGnRL6vRH9TGqkPV/mh6BJGDLYFG SYC+rEdTkeHViH26pdYB1bXD5HvQtu8E/tpwQXfAGeBGy0nx12BKlmWgtLRMXrl8XtIb qvqJkaNejYFAC+UoQHH092HqKkzwvxbCmIT30z6IYESg6AF7JzbOMSiGNQSn6XL59Dqw R4lm99HiWlI/FVzOmTUgKUJlshLzl3GtLyB9FK9YqtHnrgTqmlfgNRPFF/fsyD3apGHu KC4WxbtX7WPMn7a+4OvyPmUm3enBucIZyspio6szPb5WCF4aOVz9r04X2kSLLyM5mTo4 yg6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iFcV4Njy0R2JGK7Il5GSkREvKgDyw42IO3hHZ6LSwG4=; b=GeC5GKvc6AUV57M/qgX5hU9iJ7Qky+uJazd2WorXNemM5I4kq0ogdpK913Ppn27Qdo ugYyHnUCg7C9+pV4UPvNLSYTVd2PgkRGMoNWi59yDbipVAr86GRnJRNaSiXbE/Tz+ZHK 43XauGcGJ6J7hSk30QxjjgCO6DDP2ecW8LeLQuBvkrnPqGMblhGRch7od4JPMtqxSUbg ky3MoFxUdoEoSw1Ot7qHTpAhwmdbQSBuav51mKtPot8JPloPBe2KvDD83ZIHoEHoYCMm bTJA3GHqTkR/qQH91bACPDployHJSaqS9Y7ROaVX0RmEmyb6INRJbnvyeC1yESLsltJZ 97WA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouviOURFG93mRoTGwfhE1CuAsIZOPoTumzQNovU84oCtV2FGQslxoVwHVPsSGTi+Ha0SThOrwuFINiSK9Q==
X-Received: by 10.159.35.112 with SMTP id 103mr314023uae.55.1469139036002; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.2.244 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2ed41842a3fa4574a5e8ba12b0fff6c4@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <2ed41842a3fa4574a5e8ba12b0fff6c4@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
From: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:10:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+C0YO29wV3EpGFEsLtEcXMTDpOJyvHpC8Y21CC2rEm1JcE9ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Q&A at Microphone on GRPC
To: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ab81a5ddec105382c96ec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/HXs-A9WL9IWCbr2YUhBVymDwzr8>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:10:39 -0000
Hi Eric, Thanks for reaching out. We could continue the conversation and work towards getting the IETF community benefit from the operators point of view, like we are doing with OpenConfig. cheers -sam On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Sam, > > > > Looking at the Etherpad notes for Tuesday’s session in GRPC there is the > following Q&A exchange: > > Alia: how yang push could interwork from model perspective. > > Sam: YANG is not the only thing that we are looking at, there are other > modelling approaches available. > > > > Based on the NETCONF WG’s adoption of RFC-5277bis on Wednesday, a > simplified yang push subscription model can now be applied to event streams > of non-YANG data. > > > > If you guys want to work though how we might merge this with GRPC > transport, let me know. Some pretty cool capabilities could result. > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > >
- Re: Q&A at Microphone on GRPC Sam Aldrin
- Q&A at Microphone on GRPC Eric Voit (evoit)