Q&A at Microphone on GRPC
"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 20:12 UTC
Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCEA12D8E9 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E1dtogIcpmUJ for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6A012D8E5 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6752; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469131963; x=1470341563; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Z8xAExc+XiwshUz2aqTkV9NqL24XVZLw0wpekmJqT7c=; b=dme/AArh41sBJZE6Y6ae20vdcUBfWjlMpaqxxzwbPtvptpKP/AiHDlYA BFQmBzUxfMNuWY1eMTnjl1v71NiUf2BqIx00PxWe9ikgMB97mlizMHJwe YXEJqFRXa/htN2MpcdpBt/wAhWmKuVcJfSW8hoOasZ2kJkKtbrz16tWgw c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BPAgCwK5FX/5FdJa1dgnFOVoECs1SCdYIPgXuGGoEyOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEYy1MEgEtUyYBBA4NiCi9YAEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEBAQEdhiqOaAWZJgGOY49BkCABHjaDc4dsfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,401,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="132112337"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2016 20:12:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6LKCgQU032641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:12:42 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:12:41 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:12:41 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Q&A at Microphone on GRPC
Thread-Topic: Q&A at Microphone on GRPC
Thread-Index: AdHjjCezp/5rtzkpTYyqQ1KlyICCzA==
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:12:41 +0000
Message-ID: <2ed41842a3fa4574a5e8ba12b0fff6c4@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.203.80]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2ed41842a3fa4574a5e8ba12b0fff6c4XCHRTP013ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Oh6iDDFQ8plwpWvZqympCenMAIk>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:12:45 -0000
Hi Sam, Looking at the Etherpad notes for Tuesday's session in GRPC there is the following Q&A exchange: Alia: how yang push could interwork from model perspective. Sam: YANG is not the only thing that we are looking at, there are other modelling approaches available. Based on the NETCONF WG's adoption of RFC-5277bis on Wednesday, a simplified yang push subscription model can now be applied to event streams of non-YANG data. If you guys want to work though how we might merge this with GRPC transport, let me know. Some pretty cool capabilities could result. Thanks, Eric
- Re: Q&A at Microphone on GRPC Sam Aldrin
- Q&A at Microphone on GRPC Eric Voit (evoit)