RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Wed, 27 September 2017 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C07134B8B; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VimGJk3DYu3R; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 873F5134BAD; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 06:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.68]) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AC1D1C06FC; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.72]) by opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 7F45B40070; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200
From: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
Thread-Index: AQHTN275FLcT4GuiukaArZcj5dduU6LItNgg
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:09:47 +0000
Message-ID: <15706_1506517788_59CBA31C_15706_105_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA8172D@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <150650278635.25015.9033751036427955769@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150650278635.25015.9033751036427955769@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/JypEq8VV-sju7a8oBCUPdt0gb3Y>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:12:20 -0000

Thanks I will fix it in the next revision


-----Original Message-----
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 11:00
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2017-09-27
IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-04
IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-12

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

1. Abbreviation like RIB and FIB are not expanded 2. In section 9.1 "more simple" should be "simpler"
3. In section 9.1 " does not enough provide enough bandwidth"  to " does not provide enough bandwidth" 4. In section 9.2 "a mechanism where the convergence of the  network upon a topology change is made ordered to prevent transient forwarding loops"  is difficult to read maybe "a mechanism where the convergence of the network upon a topology change is ordered in order to prevent transient forwarding loops"



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.