RE: New Version Notification for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8412C1A1B5C for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2tN18UR9xHke for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E3B1A1A52 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 409293244C3; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.58]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1B402238055; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILM33.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::3881:fc15:b4b2:9017%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:38:53 +0200
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRBmGSOb+Td+cNKUeeTZo8Bpthw55quHAQ
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:38:53 +0000
Message-ID: <10301_1444815534_561E22AE_10301_4407_3_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F679364@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20151014090414.7964.25745.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <561E1C70.2010402@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <561E1C70.2010402@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F679364OPEXCLILM21corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.10.14.91516
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/NpcKuV3biMXaNkA76iojrd0n22A>
Cc: Pradosh Mohapatra <mpradosh@yahoo.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:38:59 -0000

Hi Ahmed,

This draft is a mostly repost of draft-rtgwg-bgp-pic-02.txt, that I commented at the time but never get an answer.
Although after 3 years I’m afraid that I lost the context, in principle I would welcome an answer

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/HrCYUfrUht7L8bBqqqYS-zqt7SA

I also assume that the IPR is equally applicable https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipr-announce/Ff0cZMBybeBfn3o-TxyUqLDYE8Q but the datatracker has no record of it https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic


Thanks,
Bruno


From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:12 AM
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Cc: Pradosh Mohapatra
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt

Hi

This a draft that explains the architecture of BGP Prefix Independent Convergence and how the architecture allows a router achieve convergence after internal and/or external topology changes that does not depend on the number BGP prefixes on a router

Please take a look

All comments are most welcomed

Thanks

Ahmed


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:

New Version Notification for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt

Date:

Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:04:14 -0700

From:

<internet-drafts@ietf.org><mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>

To:

Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com><mailto:cfilsfil@cisco.com>, Ahmed Bashandy <bashandy@cisco.com><mailto:bashandy@cisco.com>, Prodosh Mohapatra <mpradosh@yahoo.com><mailto:mpradosh@yahoo.com>, "Pradosh Mohapatra" <mpradosh@yahoo.com><mailto:mpradosh@yahoo.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt

has been successfully submitted by Ahmed Bashandy and posted to the

IETF repository.



Name:         draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic

Revision:     00

Title:        Abstract

Document date: 2015-10-12

Group:        Individual Submission

Pages:        19

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic/

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00





Abstract:

In the network comprising thousands of iBGP peers exchanging millions

of routes, many routes are reachable via more than one path. Given

the large scaling targets, it is desirable to restore traffic after

failure in a time period that does not depend on the number of BGP

prefixes. In this document we proposed a technique by which traffic

can be re-routed to ECMP or pre-calculated backup paths in a

timeframe that does not depend on the number of BGP prefixes. The

objective is achieved through organizing the forwarding chains in a

hierarchical manner and sharing forwarding elements among the maximum

possible number of routes. The proposed technique achieves prefix

independent convergence while ensuring incremental deployment,

complete transparency and automation, and zero management and

provisioning effort









Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission

until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.



The IETF Secretariat





_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.