Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-08: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 05 February 2018 10:46 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A47124205; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 02:46:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-08: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.71.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151782756152.5649.4225576974862497097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 02:46:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Oh-fRTHUwBeXKlb5c8XogEd2NM8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 10:46:02 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Two minor editorial comments: 1) Sec 1.2: I'm surprised to see an open issue listed here. Is there already any plan to address this somehow or is that listed to inform the reader, however, in the second case I would probably rather call it 'limitation' or something like this... 2) Sec 2: "In this document, we consider network devices that support protocols and functions defined within the IETF Routing Area, e.g, routers, firewalls, and hosts. " I assume that this yang module can also be used for routing protocols and functions that have not been defined in the IETF?
- Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgw… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Acee Lindem (acee)