RE: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement

Hi!

I think so.  The important part is that it doesn’t say anything about
derivative work. :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On February 6, 2019 at 4:18:55 PM, Linda Dunbar (linda.dunbar@huawei.com)
wrote:

Alvaro,

Thanks for noticing this incorrect boilerplate which was copied from other
documents.

So the answer is NOT Intended.

Is this the right boilerplate?

-----------------

Status of this Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of
BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that other groups
may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and
may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It
is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite
them other than as "work in progress."

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

Linda

*From:* Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 06, 2019 2:57 PM
*To:* draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org; Routing WG <
rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
*Cc:* RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
*Subject:* Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement

Hi!

The boilerplate in this document (under “Status of this Memo”) reads: "This
document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be
created, except to publish it as an RFC and to translate it into languages
other than English.”

With that text, the document cannot be adopted by the WG.  rfc5378 says:
"The right to produce derivative works must be granted in order for an IETF
working group to accept a Contribution as a working group document or
otherwise work on it.”

Authors:  is the text what you intend?  I suspect it may just be a leftover
from an old ID template.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On January 24, 2019 at 11:34:11 AM, Jeff Tantsura (jefftant.ietf@gmail.com)
wrote:

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to
adopt draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
as the working group documents.

There was good support during the last IETF meeting.

Please indicate support or no-support by February 10, 2019.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of
any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG
mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage
until a response has been received from each author and each
individual that has contributed to the document.

Thanks,

Jeff & Chris

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg