RE: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Wed, 06 February 2019 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AF8130E62; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:12:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Roa98gfznhst; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D77130EEC; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A53CEE3DDF95CD620B20; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:12:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:12:52 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.240]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.144]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:12:45 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org" <draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
Thread-Topic: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
Thread-Index: AQHUtAKgT7c9zhkneE27zPDwhHEgU6XT2yqA//99iDCAAI4OgP//glOw
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 22:12:45 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B297DDC@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <c824c8f5-e0f2-4f86-a4ee-1f4ec02020e7@Spark> <78efb505-b376-4799-859b-96c0b37eed68@Spark> <CAMMESsySx=ZOr5mfve3_n3LURBDc_0KXeNHS_PbJZ+6wncfN0g@mail.gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B296D0D@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAMMESsxuvtPM3MouKMB6Wj8m98ORXaLfbmk7R85TppE7nOhdkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxuvtPM3MouKMB6Wj8m98ORXaLfbmk7R85TppE7nOhdkw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.102]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B297DDCsjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/jHPDmoQb11ILxmXu6NoMMsOIm_8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 22:12:57 -0000

Alvaro,

Thank you.

The updated drafts with the correct boilerplate has been uploaded:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-gap-analysis/

Linda

From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 3:39 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org; Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement

Hi!

I think so.  The important part is that it doesn’t say anything about derivative work. :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On February 6, 2019 at 4:18:55 PM, Linda Dunbar (linda.dunbar@huawei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@huawei.com>) wrote:
Alvaro,

Thanks for noticing this incorrect boilerplate which was copied from other documents.

So the answer is NOT Intended.

Is this the right boilerplate?
-----------------
Status of this Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

Linda


From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 2:57 PM
To: draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org<mailto:draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org>; Routing WG <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement

Hi!

The boilerplate in this document (under “Status of this Memo”) reads: "This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be created, except to publish it as an RFC and to translate it into languages other than English.”

With that text, the document cannot be adopted by the WG.  rfc5378 says: "The right to produce derivative works must be granted in order for an IETF working group to accept a Contribution as a working group document or otherwise work on it.”

Authors:  is the text what you intend?  I suspect it may just be a leftover from an old ID template.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On January 24, 2019 at 11:34:11 AM, Jeff Tantsura (jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>) wrote:
Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
as the working group documents.

There was good support during the last IETF meeting.

Please indicate support or no-support by February 10, 2019.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of
any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG
mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage
until a response has been received from each author and each
individual that has contributed to the document.

Thanks,

Jeff & Chris
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg