IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: (with COMMENT)

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051C3134DE6; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QSoD5j5N4PjG; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta134.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CAF134DEF; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) by opfednr20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id C798840721; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:22:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.19]) by opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 9037D1A0059; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:22:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM44.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b08d:5b75:e92c:a45f%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:22:51 +0200
From: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTQPKTslAVdz6XR0+Hj+/5PZcg1aLdAvQw
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:22:50 +0000
Message-ID: <32182_1507638171_59DCBB9B_32182_405_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA85DCE@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <150754886353.18401.2835591038605942078.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150754886353.18401.2835591038605942078.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/T0kxhb11X-NjlNZ4nU9wnmLTHxs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:23:18 -0000

Thanks Mirja.

I will fix this in the next revision.

Brgds,

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mirja Kühlewind
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 13:34
To: The IESG
Cc: rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nit in section 9:
You should probably not talk about 'our' solution or mechanism in an RFC:
s/our/this/ or s/our X/the X described in this document/ This appears multiple times in section 9.


_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email