Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 09 October 2017 11:34 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: (with COMMENT)
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150754886353.18401.2835591038605942078.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:34:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/aNO3tXoRKQM2rWuZEty2kGTf0b8>

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nit in section 9:
You should probably not talk about 'our' solution or mechanism in an RFC:
s/our/this/ or s/our X/the X described in this document/
This appears multiple times in section 9.

Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgw… Mirja Kühlewind
RE: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-… stephane.litkowski