Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D670F130E67; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WVARuOA_LtQ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C20E130E5F; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id o15-v6so1213878qtk.6; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5bp2krAT8ChtTLSJzD8VDKUefKfxk2zNmBEpUW0fEfQ=; b=oSAkI3Mz90wPyAcUOmuyQmj7aQykYjsM3KUw8tqjyIzXmi0XW8bhOMlwaFXatugbUO FTqf1mvodQ/MS71eLngUvbng9CRgE9QrTsAdgd9Rhq1rHwZDN789RErImLW8PUvguT/d 2vqIiVIRBr2uc2m4EhTIa72yV+pONOO9J7Oyffjuf3T6zfw4XO1NQlSP9rZ9ghavTIBr P+EHgFZF5+iQYFwZYPoplTxVT2Ihl9I8CsporHgjK0tXwSEOjOjCIDj4frM7krN5FWOW 4oXitLrjOnZgUWlyCFZAopKSS0aSqGlhhT0UctSOdTFjwhkJU6isWoNU+PMtktwD3H2c f16g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5bp2krAT8ChtTLSJzD8VDKUefKfxk2zNmBEpUW0fEfQ=; b=MO0kg4yyiLRYqBkiQ41av3R37BD8VGMMtpaxOcMXT1EP3WPqAeD67+yokdlfpJyBJT +7b0JMBqm0dgk4lQC8J/zCRuLV21+1BCzEkg6zO7rfqVzOCtBcWrktHCJc1+nZofmH4l 1EJA+j62XJ1NLkmVPPGXVX5VfKJ1Bb9j4ppdICLWpUujPMKPPZ39Sb0dwu9JGMUxOfmB 0pV6PRZY0JjkZqwpMK4+uwdK8YULzGIhIWYfT9NBIpE1XotwVS0ms5uouMzFrXVhD+1Y 7im9T98mVbTvG7ALmBEev9F2JejoCUZqzIzUdICrwrq3+RU8NSG9pZvlsUviM68e3xyO hkwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BoZKZqgjV45DALrB7TnCTaY5u5WBdI2VJY5i0d/Fhlp/Px6/0i 5gs2PGf2bl43Yya6CoFYdvzk/hYDCEjpfsDq0BAO666WtTI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaGqJu2DMUdv/VhlyP+6xiquwZjJ+ctafCOoBPt8wwQEylWL+z+GvEQWgt0M1LCmnEP6kX/cGhdcr4bAevVEUo=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e205:: with SMTP id q5-v6mr30278361qvl.224.1537527034331; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR05MB44300874E544A6CD494D291CA9250@SN6PR05MB4430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAHzoHbsrq3_p7d2obL9S1RJw2n6AmZB_C82J+6K0frO+2SY1hw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHzoHbsmM6Bb+JwD=-hhkDeV_UqD7z+6e1ykSFwu8fD-7GTfGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHzoHbsmM6Bb+JwD=-hhkDeV_UqD7z+6e1ykSFwu8fD-7GTfGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:20:22 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHzoHbuwarMy9nj1YooDNEYj7uiap62y2rj+VrHXi5j=iVMBKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b6c6df05765f685a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/drMFce7jqzby0n4PRSIBm61Y1Lk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 10:50:38 -0000

RTGWG,



Jeff and I have decided to go ahead and adopt
draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

as a WG document.



Although we have not received IPR responses from two of the authors, we do
not want

to delay work on this document.  We will continue to work to get the
information needed

for the working group and the rest of the IETF to make an informed decision
about

the use of the technology in this draft.  For more information on
intellectual property

rights in IETF technology, see RFC 8179.



Please post the text of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-04 as

draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-00.



Thanks,

Chris and Jeff


On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:07 PM Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors,
>
> We have gotten IPR responses from Bruno and Stephane.
>
> We still need IPR responses on the RTGWG list from Ahmed, Clarence,
> Pierre, and Daniel.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:25 PM Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> RTGWG,
>>
>> We have gotten IPR responses from two of the six authors of this draft.
>> We need responses from the other four authors as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> wrote:
>>
>>> RTGWG,
>>>
>>> Jeff and I think it makes sense to adopt
>>> draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
>>> as a working group document.
>>>
>>> There has been a lot of useful discussion about this draft on the
>>> list..  However, the text of the
>>> draft has not been modified to reflect a good deal of valid feedback
>>> from reviewers.
>>> We intend to address this issue if and when the draft becomes a working
>>> group document.
>>>
>>> Please indicate your support or opposition to the adoption of this
>>> draft.
>>>
>>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
>>> this email stating
>>> whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.   The response needs
>>> to be sent to the
>>> RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage
>>> until a response has
>>> been received from each author and each individual that has contributed
>>> to the document.
>>>
>>> At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure associated
>>> with it.
>>> *https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/*
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/>
>>>
>>> This adoption poll will end on August 24th.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris and Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>>
>>>
>>