Re: Power consumption reduction in edge and core routers in the internet

Balaji Venkat <balajivenkat299@gmail.com> Sat, 08 September 2012 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <balajivenkat299@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F8321F8495 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YMcDrQsx39pW for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED2721F8493 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so1112330pbb.31 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=AkFK8GB3sM6cCJvte39Rv2cPv4FsKSm93DwGFFPlo28=; b=Yca8uMbhvtNJ8mQQNZc46V+STfZi+6tg2fwyNXttae581ZfwBce+h+bZ5brXMBs8HT dTCIIEFT8IrVvXVD8YM+z94+wsLznn9YcfKZ/s/PSut1w7ngsrc1N03HwND3G9RMMzoP oXBKDvsSAJBDU5wIro20OQ1TpGwD+6nvTyrWRwSGVMe1MuQYtnjLRhnUdCtb/8pyFk4G 7kKVOdXfXED0IXs1a7gDi3t+RoHjow5E7qBojJOrn1HzU0RMGnCmRWkeQsg4Boa5JHrL bgfZ41uZwtU4KCPgXrAwlTQTu8GVZ/qn6hvrZLkwJ+5lt72OtD91v+Y9Az6qsXasTBHu ipvQ==
Received: by 10.66.74.196 with SMTP id w4mr15200480pav.32.1347137134242; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [223.231.150.91] ([223.231.150.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rz10sm5901521pbc.32.2012.09.08.13.45.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
References: <201209082002.q88K2YgM021133@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com>
In-Reply-To: <201209082002.q88K2YgM021133@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <BB69859C-0287-4904-B41E-CFDA28E26A62@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
From: Balaji Venkat <balajivenkat299@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Power consumption reduction in edge and core routers in the internet
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 02:15:27 +0530
To: "curtis@occnc.com" <curtis@occnc.com>
Cc: Shankar Raman <mjsraman@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:45:35 -0000

Dear Curtis,

We used nroffedit for preparing these drafts and forgot to delete the default references that got stuck in there. 

We intended these to be serious material.

If you could comment on the specifics of why you disagree with our proposals it would be most beneficial.

Regards
Balaji

Sent from my iPad

On 09-Sep-2012, at 1:32 AM, Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> wrote:

> 
> In message <CC71048E.E133%balajivenkat299@gmail.com>
> balaji venkat Venkataswami writes:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> After due consultation with the chairs and IRTF folks we have been
>> instructed to ask for discussion on the following drafts that deal with
>> power consumption reduction in edge and core devices in the internet.
>> 
>> We deal with the problem in a hierarchical approach. One within an
>> Autonomous System and the other between Autonomous Systems and hence for the
>> whole internet.
>> 
>> We duly submit to you this work that we have done for your kind review and
>> consideration.
>> 
>> We deal with solutions for unicast and multicast at the AS level and the
>> intra-AS level. Multicast solutions mostly in the intra-AS level.
>> 
>> We submit this work and request you to comment on it.
>> 
>> Multicast intra-AS level
>> * mjsraman-pce-power-replic
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-pce-power-replic>  (timeline)
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-pce-power-replic-timing
>> .html> 
>> * mjsraman-pim-ecmp-redirect-power-replic-cap
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-pim-ecmp-redirect-power-replic-ca
>> p>  (timeline) 
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-pim-ecmp-redirect-power
>> -replic-cap-timing.html>
>> Unicast AS level
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-bgp-power-path
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-bgp-power-path>  (timeline)
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-bgp-power-path-ti
>> ming.html> 
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp>  (timeline)
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-timi
>> ng.html> 
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp>  (timeline)
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-timi
>> ng.html> 
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-protect
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-protect>
>> (timeline) 
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-inter-as-psp-prot
>> ect-timing.html> 
>> Unicast intra-AS level
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-intra-as-psp-te-leak
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-intra-as-psp-te-leak>
>> (timeline) 
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-intra-as-psp-te-l
>> eak-timing.html> 
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-ospf-power-topo
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-ospf-power-topo>
>> (timeline) 
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-ospf-power-topo-t
>> iming.html> 
>> Multicast intra-AS level
>> * mjsraman-rtgwg-pim-power
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-pim-power>  (timeline)
>> <http://www.arkko.com/tools/lifecycle/draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-pim-power-timing.
>> html> 
>> 
>> Thanks again to the WG and IETF chairs for letting us share our work with
>> this group.
>> 
>> Thanks and regards
>> Shankar and team
> 
> 
> My first reaction was that this was just a really bad idea from some
> students who didn't understand very much about how provider networks
> were built.
> 
> But looking at some of the citations I'm wondering if this whole thing
> is just a joke.
> 
>  draft-mjsraman-rtgwg-ospf-power-topo-01
> 
>   [EVILBIT]  Bellovin, S., "The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header",
>              RFC 3514, April 1 2003.
> 
>   [RFC5513]  Farrel, A., "IANA Considerations for Three Letter
>              Acronyms", RFC 5513, April 1 2009.
> 
>   [RFC5514] Vyncke, E., "IPv6 over Social Networks", RFC 5514, April
>             1 2009.
> 
> I'm really hoping the whole thing is a joke, but unfortunately I do
> think that you are seriously proposing this.  Just confirming first.
> 
> Curtis