I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 04 May 2015 09:12 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F52B1AC408; Mon, 4 May 2015 02:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2DijufGgJgj; Mon, 4 May 2015 02:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002B61A8862; Mon, 4 May 2015 02:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-00.txt
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.2.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150504091249.4570.3281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 02:12:49 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/uX7iBBpPmkXxzKLrdVqK7Nuz05U>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 09:12:51 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Link State protocols SPF trigger and delay algorithm impact on IGP microloops
Author : Stephane Litkowski
Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-00.txt
Pages : 13
Date : 2015-05-04
Abstract:
A micro-loop is a packet forwarding loop that may occur transiently
among two or more routers in a hop-by-hop packet forwarding paradigm.
In this document, we are trying to analyze the impact of using
different Link State IGP implementations in a single network in
regards of microloops. The analysis is focused on the SPF triggers
and SPF delay algorithm.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement-00
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-stateme… internet-drafts