Re: We've got lift-off

Walter Houser <houser.walt@FORUM.VA.GOV> Mon, 30 April 2001 14:28 UTC

Received: from mailbag.cps.intel.com ([192.102.199.72]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id KAA12183 for <run-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 10:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailbag.intel.com (mailbag.cps.intel.com [192.102.199.72]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 2000/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id GAA12436; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 06:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILBAG.INTEL.COM by MAILBAG.INTEL.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 5495 for IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 06:59:27 -0700
Received: from httpprxy.aac.va.gov (smtp.mail.va.gov [63.160.3.131]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 2000/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id GAA12432 for <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 06:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from forum.va.gov ([152.125.23.1]) by httpprxy.aac.va.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA10508 for <IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:57:17 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <10103161840.AA19972@Ludwig.sc.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3AED6F33.D6B53CDF@forum.va.gov>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:57:07 -0400
Reply-To: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM>
Sender: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM>
From: Walter Houser <houser.walt@FORUM.VA.GOV>
Subject: Re: We've got lift-off
To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Where is the authoritative version of draft-ietf-run-adverts-02.txt?  The document draft-ietf-run-adverts-02.txt is not on the ID
list.

Sally Hambridge wrote:

> In case you didn't see this....
>
> Thanks very much to Ted and April for getting the DOC
> to this stage.  We can now have recess.
>
> Sally
> sallyh@ludwig.sc.intel.com
>
> >From ietf-123-owner@loki.ietf.org Fri Mar 16 09:30:18 2001
> Received: from crotus.sc.intel.com (scfdns02.sc.intel.com) by Ludwig.sc.intel.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
>         id AA19911; Fri, 16 Mar 01 09:30:17 PST
> Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki.ietf.org [132.151.1.177])
>         by crotus.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.35 2001/02/12 09:03:45 smothers Exp $) with ESMTP id RAA01965
>         for <sallyh@LUDWIG.SC.INTEL.COM>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:33:44 GMT
> Received: (from adm@localhost)
>         by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id KAA07480
>         for ietf-123-outbound.03@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:45:00 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28])
>         by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07464
>         for <all-ietf@loki.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:38:14 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>         by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05265;
>         Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:38:14 -0500 (EST)
> Message-Id: <200103161538.KAA05265@ietf.org>
> To: IETF-Announce:;@loki.ietf.org
> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>, IANA <iana@iana.org>
> Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
> Cc: ietf-run@mailbag.cps.intel.com
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Subject: Document Action: How to Advertise Responsibly Using the E-Mail
>          and Newsgroups or- how NOT to $$$$$ MAKE ENEMIES FAST $$$$$ to
>          Informational
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:38:14 -0500
> Sender: scoya@cnri.reston.va.us
> Status: R
>
> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'How to Advertise Responsibly
> Using the E-Mail and Newsgroups or- how NOT to $$$$$ MAKE ENEMIES FAST
> $$$$$' <draft-ietf-run-adverts-02.txt> as a Informational.  This
> document is the product of the Responsible Use of the Network Working
> Group.  The IESG contact person is April Marine.
>
> Note to RFC Editor:
>
> The IESG respectfully requests the following be added prior to
> publication as an RFC:
>
> Security Considerations
>
> This memo offers suggestions for responsible advertising techniques that
> can be used via the Internet.  It does not raise or address security
> issues, but special attention should be paid to the section on "Privacy."
> While not strictly a network security consideration, privacy
> considerations can have legal ramifications that deserve special
> attention.

--
Walt Houser, VA Webmaster http://www.va.gov/
VA Privacy Notice for Information Collected from E-mails and Web Forms http://www.va.gov/privacy/email.asp