IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Pinning

"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> Tue, 05 June 2012 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C364521F8775 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OkeF4TvqhKB for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (smtp.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5573621F875A for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laphotz.jpl.nasa.gov (laphotz.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.133.44]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q55KGTDn030440 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified NO); Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:16:30 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <4FCE6431.6050808@ieca.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:16:29 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <33D30C0D-5399-43BE-9113-D50AA25DAB62@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <4FCE6431.6050808@ieca.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Source-Sender: hotz@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Cc: saag@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [saag] Pinning
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:16:32 -0000

On Jun 5, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Sean Turner wrote:

> Is a standards-track operations statement needed to describe the choices that a TLS server administrator has, and to deal with conflicts between the proposals?

IMO, ultimately, absolutely.  I doubt we have sufficient understanding and consensus to do it yet (but I hope I'm wrong).
------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email