IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] metadata insertion draft question

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 30 October 2016 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479B612940A for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egMiHQagwk-e for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066A01293FE for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3689FBE2E; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:43:22 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6BC_8Fdhqnd; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:43:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.210] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 991CABE2C; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:43:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1477863801; bh=O/P8SAzgR99NJ1s4yG+oHAQFzs6SojXk4AIE12DRh48=; h=Subject:References:To:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EurHl6BQnO/Qu88XGpkHTmNevRCv8K1ynitp8uj6r6SO4AkNUzUfDqFuq1Maq6fPB OKExGq1aTE0nqhtMcVdtpu2I+Yjv7cKAs4fvk5ruVCGV9io+iZ6yElloVRxIEJ+UMX lOJm4fw3gKfH9uc2VsAHaPYYvyxjKhJz10OknaSw=
References: <86bbe523-972b-772c-b002-dbdbbedc00c8@cs.tcd.ie> <cef5748a0619453c85ea7a5f93632303@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <8C32B083-A92C-4FB1-B7B0-7B4F1A3E8F52@gmail.com>
To: Security Area Advisory Group <saag@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <92f3868e-cdb8-f95c-efb4-71471f34c887@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:43:20 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8C32B083-A92C-4FB1-B7B0-7B4F1A3E8F52@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090805060600060901010709"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/6ME28uCw3qMYS2j0lrd0DcKdn4g>
Subject: Re: [saag] metadata insertion draft question
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:43:25 -0000

Wrapping up on this thread - I don't see discussion of
3552bis taking off yet (sadly) so as of now I plan to
AD sponsor this draft separately. Once Ted tells me he
thinks this is baked, I'll do my AD review and all going
well, after that's sorted start an IETF LC.

If, at any point in the processing of this draft, there
emerges a consensus to incorporate this into 3552bis, I'll
be fine with that, but for now it looks like 3552bis may
take a while.

Cheers,
S.

PS: Ted - Randy's comment up thread was a substantive
comment on the content, please take a look at that if
you've not already.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email