IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Agenda request: draft-barnes-dane-uks

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 28 October 2016 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E38312947A for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZDoHS6yi1hT for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4490A129432 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v138so19731276qka.0 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vzlW0+BlUvsBJYjhlZ5iqFb7qLWDcZfDhfYs6UIQc38=; b=bMdAb3kEcMmE7VnjwjN9swNs7Dmlvw5PQu2b7uFGQFZUZqpRE0BU/hE/5oYEwAz3MK 7t/WmhzLg2yHguBPusMTWVtkiS5Wq52lwePXX0vcVvlo4GNAgG29aes/z2WfSDyiJrSf NjxGbILcG4TrbqpfkGYFoNL28k/CapTktsRldHrbqJ/mEKI+3mtaU8O6bUb/EFLqydaf fcEOkcOaasEP9L8uOihjrqjtpEZrsdt34KaPA/vV2C48wJHKdS3OZAHv0ERhy6T5AMtu gGejXzaN1jdE2poQfpnycF1e6ECFYRPoRTfIXERNkaWBPp6pUSZdC0mXJruHiyV8iZOX QT5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=vzlW0+BlUvsBJYjhlZ5iqFb7qLWDcZfDhfYs6UIQc38=; b=PefBpy3xXnXlextgn2Ajn9ElkYEpda7m3s4AI1zezWb+kdrZbAk9fDQEl3G61XL3+2 K4u+mFRySTRwTGgj+IHFML7w4utXW2t1Q01Y+d3FZHVyus+VkqnXnGLDPE9o7w7jroxv 8pEkTkaF806AvFNO/CPmljPYu05GL666BZbgDkHuiQOP/zxJ1wmARVprJyGw+otVGSN0 EZzQ7CsaOfbBqbHcfz9hq1pHlRl2NrChepI6dfIl02VMjf+prGYn/0GrKh6QbPkM4mYu 7WofSiQCdcV7S5/0QPppJ6akbaBhsgt1PrCK0UziovRmy4I4n62GInHu9wxEnG0Ipw67 Ifwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd1BXYwSqRHdfdllfOMK6xnBStN+pdxePo+WOcm/xAnaPeQ0sQpdu8wS0JjkriS9VzEh5HRw+dLNvd90w==
X-Received: by 10.55.155.151 with SMTP id d145mr9119720qke.115.1477634290358; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161028001803.GC26244@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CABkgnnU1Lyyi7jqQteVYTJL-j5V3m0tE=o=XumD2jqroynWBgA@mail.gmail.com> <20161028001803.GC26244@mournblade.imrryr.org>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:58:09 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVvsLLn5VygLyH2iCmm0PWKXxZy+ZJRaXvTqeGp=gUEqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: saag <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/t5kCSxKeH7fNJCOoHJQbnm6_JW0>
Subject: Re: [saag] Agenda request: draft-barnes-dane-uks
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:58:12 -0000

On 28 October 2016 at 11:18, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
>If the discussion is of a more general nature, on how to avoid
> potential pitfalls in future documents, by all means proceed on-site.

This was my intent.  I think we can work out the detail on a mailing list.

> For applications much
> simpler than browsers with their "same-origin" trust-mode, and
> especially applications that already employ MX, SRV or similar
> indirection, UKS is out of scope.

For the record, I disagree with this very broad assertion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email