IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] NIST requests comments on using ISO/IEC 19790:2012 as the U.S. Federal Standard for cryptographic modules

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 18 August 2015 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359A81A87C0 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXnXUajOEOua for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF3E1A87AC for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713172009E; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9541563B10; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:13:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B8663AEC; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:13:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <55D26385.8050203@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <55CE5A40.3090804@cs.tcd.ie> <CAPofZaGT__FmChCWNf=iMsyD4s7c1SpUus2Lm_6ubhA3ayfGqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG-id0ZYG946xZQrsfrMqyQunLpg=ZeGGP8BcQRVtFE0s7b3DQ@mail.gmail.com> <55CF35B2.9020302@cs.tcd.ie> <CACz1E9rg8ZtHLCpZ8utBF67PTOiDKWTDGvepqL0SXL_0WR0=+g@mail.gmail.com> <F2C87ED1-E00B-4B46-AF01-33FF4FD0A237@vigilsec.com> <CAL02cgQjM=gStDy-O1a4GXBFh=2Zur4br4Ea17XKW3_fEru1MA@mail.gmail.com> <75EDF4F6-A8E9-4423-ACD2-31671413EFBD@vigilsec.com> <55D26385.8050203@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:13:08 -0400
Message-ID: <11010.1439907188@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/UpE0QaENVasP8epRVYmdKjjnXc4>
Cc: IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [saag] NIST requests comments on using ISO/IEC 19790:2012 as the U.S. Federal Standard for cryptographic modules
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:13:17 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
    > On 17/08/15 23:31, Russ Housley wrote:
    >> I think it would be stronger if these comments went to NIST from the
    >> IETF Security Area Directors or the IESG.

    > Fair enough, I'm happy to chat with Kathleen and see how
    > best to process a statement if you or someone has time to
    > draft a bit of text. Or if nobody does I'll try get to it
    > next week if Kathleen doesn't beat me to it. (I at least
    > may need reminding - so please bug me if nothing appears
    > to happen a lot;-)

    > I don't think it'd be right for the IESG to send but I'm
    > happy to chat with the IESG and IAB to find a way to get
    > the message sent. (*)

I think it's directly related to OpenStand.




--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email