IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] draft-moore-iot-bcp-00 (Best Current Practices for Securing Internet of Things (IoT) Devices)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 11 November 2016 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02141294DC for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:25:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dpyIvIQ9ZRV for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:25:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E41912948D for <saag@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:25:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uABMOx9f001470; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:24:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:144:d067:5c30:da5c:d92a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:144:d067:5c30:da5c:d92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3tFvc96B2jz7yBN; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:24:57 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1478854787137.79505@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:24:53 +0900
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 500595893.170267-f1869405f39fdc2a474ef62b8f300eef
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A0047BE-3C77-4D0C-BB5B-CE4AAF983228@tzi.org>
References: <63ae04d9-9a31-498c-3333-2801a72338f0@network-heretics.com> <99b43920-ee16-3cb2-731b-941718749cf5@afrinic.net> <CACsn0cmce8ZpDThPGA01PgnLfkyD3GyjJJVayiCaFikDUnZ77w@mail.gmail.com> <d0ec0ef0-67d8-0f14-c64e-537cab031b2c@gmx.net> <1478850654823.89451@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <CA+eFz_+9dsFvaVfw32ra1RJuS1wBGi_mQavjx3aBiQ7yknqNMA@mail.gmail.com> <1478854787137.79505@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/cF5WVEzsKqpo9S-5SA7yZPcsPNs>
Cc: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [saag] draft-moore-iot-bcp-00 (Best Current Practices for Securing Internet of Things (IoT) Devices)
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:25:15 -0000

> In any case though the point is to come up with a taxonomy of
> embedded/SCADA/IoT/whatever device types that represent typical use cases...

JFYI: To talk about classes of devices, we already have RFC 7228.
The LWIG WG is now looking at updating this document.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis/

This is work in progress, but we are very open to useful classification to be added to this document.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email