IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Updated IETF 95 Agenda Posted

Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net> Fri, 01 April 2016 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1859A12D183 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=siriscapitalgroupllc.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJpQ1mlkNEX8 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0090.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500AB12D715 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=SirisCapitalGroupLLC.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-pulsesecure-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=p94CpfoaNV+0axnSFT+IRH9VYOXG4sF0n/ALid5CuZQ=; b=BuCDrFtyeqgE0yrZwPSe/lDQXjlNfb6K8NE+5Ab9/EkPqTwNP7rZETqaCuaJ3KFHTxOnqayFAwNrbXJXElF73IZQ1HPcM1FStRndyuS6Jfymd1efjLWaRPH12cvuZDMGGi1JBURauhvTyqtYHtRZJQqOR9iYWwYca+SAC0JNmyc=
Received: from SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.58.28) by SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.58.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.443.12; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:04:41 +0000
Received: from SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.58.28]) by SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.58.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0443.017; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:04:40 +0000
From: Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
To: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>, "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sacm] Updated IETF 95 Agenda Posted
Thread-Index: AQHRiheDd1hl9dc4XkGEraZ/+FQVN59xNbAQ
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:04:40 +0000
Message-ID: <SN2PR0601MB099226A18B2F660403AB4DC8A89A0@SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <04C2FAE9-476B-489F-81CB-48BCAAFA29D6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <04C2FAE9-476B-489F-81CB-48BCAAFA29D6@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=pulsesecure.net;
x-originating-ip: [98.26.33.154]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d84479df-cd26-428f-e57b-08d35a475550
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN2PR0601MB0992; 5:k7+YVb8WjeDxl57QsuKX86kfALl3DfylfdwKixGz3B3wCzSv9ybxdf81OLYtexWMaB3OBVA9NsMvVqqD9UisxXFDZGa/ysRdfsD4VjaJ2uhA7Edh7M4v2wbyByUN8vR3myN3YVC68oVF0k46L4TCUw==; 24:FgPOGwZ3+Xnftff2+lvXtG2cDte96LqEOOSsjiiPHa0aUn/jDeTt5DvNDkA6VfEQSUKh4bQFEqqNEIKWi6srYTEtrNZHTz8kZhGfijpAuiU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN2PR0601MB0992;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN2PR0601MB0992C9E1B1851FCA839772EEA89A0@SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:SN2PR0601MB0992; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR0601MB0992;
x-forefront-prvs: 0899B47777
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(71364002)(377454003)(13464003)(76576001)(99286002)(15650500001)(5008740100001)(3280700002)(2906002)(106116001)(3846002)(10400500002)(66066001)(92566002)(1220700001)(86362001)(1096002)(19580395003)(102836003)(3660700001)(586003)(6116002)(74316001)(5003600100002)(107886002)(189998001)(5002640100001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(87936001)(33656002)(77096005)(50986999)(76176999)(54356999)(19580405001)(5001770100001)(81166005)(5004730100002)(122556002)(491001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR0601MB0992; H:SN2PR0601MB0992.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: pulsesecure.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Apr 2016 16:04:40.8508 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 3290a917-9dd6-43db-843b-a3e376f9f96c
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR0601MB0992
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/TsTSqNGxQG55t8WXGCY6CAy7F6Y>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Updated IETF 95 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:05:07 -0000

Hi Adam et al.,

Now that the WGLC last call for the requirements draft has completed with no new issues raised, I have a follow-up request:

Like Jim, I can only attend on Wednesday; I'd like to be able to participate in the ECP conversation   Can we move it to Wednesday by either dropping the requirements draft entirely, or moving the requirements draft to Friday?

Regarding the requirements draft - I don't think we need 20 minutes for it in BA:  
  * All four remaining open issues from github were addressed in the latest version, based on the agreements reached either in the issue thread or at the last virtual interim.
  * The updates to address those issues were all brief - two of them add one sentence each; two of them change one word each.
  * No new issues were raised in the WGLC.

So I believe we could drop the requirements draft entirely from the F2F agenda and move directly to a call for consensus to progress the draft, based on the lack of objections in the WGLC.  

If it's mandatory to review the changes at an F2F before doing so, I believe that will only take about 5 minutes.  Either way, I think the remaining 15 or 20 minutes on Friday would be much better spent on the terminology draft!

Regards,
Lisa


-----Original Message-----
From: sacm [mailto:sacm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Montville
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:03 PM
To: <sacm@ietf.org> <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: [sacm] Updated IETF 95 Agenda Posted

I’ve updated the agenda based on Jim’s request to move the information model forward (I swapped it with SWID).

If you are on the agenda as a presenter, please get your slides to the chairs at least the day before our Wednesday session.  Also, please let us know if you need to present remotely so we can loop in the MeetEcho folks as necessary.

Finally, and as always, we’re going to need a couple of people in the room to take notes and a jabber scribe.  Any early takers?

Kind regards,

Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email