Re: [sacm] Updated IETF 95 Agenda Posted

[Adam Montville <[e-mail]>]

I have no issue dropping that slot entirely and using that time for ECP.

If no one objects over the next day or so, I’ll gladly update the agenda.  My understanding is that as long as no issues were raised during WGLC we can progress the draft.

Thanks for offering up opinions—agenda as originally posted was just a proposed starting place.

Adam

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Lisa Lorenzin <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Adam et al.,
> 
> Now that the WGLC last call for the requirements draft has completed with no new issues raised, I have a follow-up request:
> 
> Like Jim, I can only attend on Wednesday; I'd like to be able to participate in the ECP conversation   Can we move it to Wednesday by either dropping the requirements draft entirely, or moving the requirements draft to Friday?
> 
> Regarding the requirements draft - I don't think we need 20 minutes for it in BA:
>  * All four remaining open issues from github were addressed in the latest version, based on the agreements reached either in the issue thread or at the last virtual interim.
>  * The updates to address those issues were all brief - two of them add one sentence each; two of them change one word each.
>  * No new issues were raised in the WGLC.
> 
> So I believe we could drop the requirements draft entirely from the F2F agenda and move directly to a call for consensus to progress the draft, based on the lack of objections in the WGLC.
> 
> If it's mandatory to review the changes at an F2F before doing so, I believe that will only take about 5 minutes.  Either way, I think the remaining 15 or 20 minutes on Friday would be much better spent on the terminology draft!
> 
> Regards,
> Lisa
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sacm [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Adam Montville
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:03 PM
> To: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [sacm] Updated IETF 95 Agenda Posted
> 
> I’ve updated the agenda based on Jim’s request to move the information model forward (I swapped it with SWID).
> 
> If you are on the agenda as a presenter, please get your slides to the chairs at least the day before our Wednesday session.  Also, please let us know if you need to present remotely so we can loop in the MeetEcho folks as necessary.
> 
> Finally, and as always, we’re going to need a couple of people in the room to take notes and a jabber scribe.  Any early takers?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Adam