IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] ECP Architecture Diagram Feedback

Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB71C12D875 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FreePOggq9B0 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C8112D870 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id t16-v6so13832786oih.3 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=rhMcTTCNrtxSO/K9Em6uOs282p8PmpQYD+xFuxI4B90=; b=h1LkI2TjqtzVsCY8PZWmwt68gCxVZ9lG6VJg3fURDNw2TG1/UzXWv2h7Mtr4pTRHxy vSsZMrFNFWUNLnXIuGDn6oWQuNa0yl5TQZUvm7aFFdRoNQq87ZKLJz1iVLWnmo5pSpf0 Z4fghV7boNh0ZEP1c0Na/TbQpGZR66JJeNz4YZFHW9voeLfxqoLAp6R1VMD0sz9VWpQ7 IVni+65U7gnLtIEZalJrUKFJMa6On+PLOoIbwFYPl5o1FzxlVpfhg60xTvVKu9dPiF4Z xA6FDHh5c9MPrjA3htk2aAKRyddPLxRAr9/Gk4cbrTHmueTDRaNEZi0bKa4LiET+8nf2 ayYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=rhMcTTCNrtxSO/K9Em6uOs282p8PmpQYD+xFuxI4B90=; b=FK+wG580RGRxWdjuzQRT5+DGAEaQwS+zxt7+oFIKca89uTHBANbxDhKQdypp8WkZdn ZuInib4SnISpVaCiFOwQDOF+dpiO2IP3LjnPN3KPrRBZ8y6+SihXrzgOK9O01HWv6JQY y4KUq3LLm9MKCtOdWqBtFcs1pM3HjQlGPLvExfs64B08gYAeEKA/dsYX15O350dohktI 5QTBy9+9TsVaP7JODxqKX/zK492U8o0IKOMQbl3N64rFoLN1RMNr6Plb+7kjB3Rny/Tc DrPmpaIJp/GfNgViEA62MiEtoqxneXYMSSldlXYPc8Oo6JB7ZV+pom0La+V4+rymlhQ0 bQnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7H2uZ8jiLc/DAnMhIpzkUhhHMMFLKyhZxV8oIMfxROYAFNQS3Tu PfCb617b7a+LWLeNmhuWEtEdG8SH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48YYupy+4CpRUe97U+dk4lckSG+c/ia9g5diPoRqd/1KkT/unUmGlpmIsomUK656W5+wNLU+Q==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ea06:: with SMTP id i6-v6mr6232763oih.235.1522697556855; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 12:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-3.lan (99-64-100-131.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [99.64.100.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 15-v6sm511184ois.30.2018.04.02.12.32.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Apr 2018 12:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D0D3E5A5-2D22-4B3A-AD3E-27386CC43887@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_900A0546-631F-4E91-BE7A-CA2F36B65A56"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 14:32:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR0901MB2197070C2CF8BA9A4283251CA5A60@DM5PR0901MB2197.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
To: "Haynes Jr., Dan" <dhaynes@mitre.org>
References: <DM5PR0901MB2197070C2CF8BA9A4283251CA5A60@DM5PR0901MB2197.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/aWedpr1IgX6xbqZ8iqcH0V_dq5k>
Subject: Re: [sacm] ECP Architecture Diagram Feedback
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:32:40 -0000

Hi Danny,

We missed you in London. I think the diagram is ok, but I do have scoping questions (just sent to the list) which may suggest some modification to the diagram once resolved. If the way I'm interpreting the ECP draft at this point is close to accurate, then it might be a good idea to add a horizontal scoping line between the left hand and the right hand of the diagram, where the posture manager is the first component on the right-hand side. Alternatively, an in-scope boundary box could be drawn around the appropriate components.

What really matters is whether the diagram accurately depicts the intended scope of the draft from the authors' perspectives, and whether a typical reader would see it that way.

Adam

> On Apr 2, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Haynes Jr., Dan <dhaynes@mitre.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> At IETF 101, we presented an updated architecture diagram [1] that was based on feedback from the September virtual interim [2][3] and was included in the ECP -01 draft [4]. During the meeting, we did not receive any feedback on the architecture diagram.
>  
> As a result, we just wanted to follow-up on the list and see if there was any feedback or objections to the updated ECP architecture diagram that was proposed.
>  
> Thanks,
> 
> Danny
>  
>  
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-sacm-endpoint-compliance-profile-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-sacm-endpoint-compliance-profile-00> (see slide 4)
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2017-sacm-03-sessa-ecp/00/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2017-sacm-03-sessa-ecp/00/> (see slide 5)
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2017-sacm-03/materials/minutes-interim-2017-sacm-03-201709260900-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2017-sacm-03/materials/minutes-interim-2017-sacm-03-201709260900-00> (see page 1 and 2)
> [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-ecp/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-ecp/>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email