IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Referencing the TCG IF-IMC and IF-IMV Specifications for ECP

Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DE212D877 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQGzf19G5N3i for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x230.google.com (mail-ot0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC1D12D875 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n40-v6so16796347otd.3 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Ps3zumlxD0sWueeCA/5v1veqlx8+p4bBG6S+U+xBASg=; b=Q3+w5WkiOqsuA/LS4phXP9tVjrzJo4O+d4oSYGlVBPMF6B0kQoIZPpbUIm5HpK+QXB d3HQL0Ebb3GhN3b/KereCyC5k9VrcXBcB/AbBlIXc/amAlzffV6oXPEQcRYO8WmdC/EO BZRCzZpz2JYdAPlDNaLopLctOwTxQ27xGDPgkOUm1jrEk1PNImzYy+XtVY5OwdayG2oR ERSUuUsmoDEe/tbUXxCO4HzZNPbX+v0s/980OYXvTvKG7YV9hfx//d7412yYDwJOmnm2 j7y3HtJBvracQgE6/srlbrPIZnh/2YeMsilFBSpUZ8s3tWCXoUBd7vlHAIWHucilRdNS eLtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Ps3zumlxD0sWueeCA/5v1veqlx8+p4bBG6S+U+xBASg=; b=K1JYcaLKyl5/fw/WqjhrAr1mohDp0Kxmgyr+xabm9e5r6K4OdXuu4St+rBvz2U8AKc cUBwkMtlfUwoiYtiPD75qqOXcIbD55BaDEOCjGuyT+njOcd+/9SdTj/VJYeySa6MPBV7 lNUVvmforR5RZECYTuNZdQQZhSr9a3DkddQe2QEgC9dMrApk2U9wdNQh/Pon5wtlzvMW j7r6OMmXNlMNFLylUZnE51kuR8IGJq0qQAMwpdnehuVUqGVIuhKvldEYAJbMfyU5rlKB g0HtiMwdPhZ9EA+C22ScWE8wK4u3bEpioGAczp5TUhRWt/MvZtZ1DhcDdVKWrpb9F8gK dv3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDURzgUXMM4pOUvV2a0m/bjF4Is2OR6G6/oCcp8ju7QjVHNAUVF RkQPqqByscjIogBOeIVRyro=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48m7vz+tm8Vx0EOszvNHW5y/hU33bQVtrDTyuNnjIVedM4GLV7j8uBjyjKjpcb6IDqBjY6lhQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:32e1:: with SMTP id u88-v6mr5969174otb.87.1522697684009; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-3.lan (99-64-100-131.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [99.64.100.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u32-v6sm573362otb.9.2018.04.02.12.34.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Apr 2018 12:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9095F1F7-5655-4CE2-BEA1-C9FD05D2C9A7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C9233694-28B9-400B-9A9A-55E3C46438CF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 14:34:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gSs0EYJyDHzvyPQ5Xv67t7L0Om9yU0-tP7cEoDXThzjtKg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Haynes Jr., Dan" <dhaynes@mitre.org>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
References: <DM5PR0901MB21972CEE7FA5E1615182100BA5A60@DM5PR0901MB2197.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <CAN40gSs0EYJyDHzvyPQ5Xv67t7L0Om9yU0-tP7cEoDXThzjtKg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/i36vNzGUYFRwi9mNToAFY5lSE2E>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Referencing the TCG IF-IMC and IF-IMV Specifications for ECP
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:34:47 -0000

Provided there's no IETF issue with referencing these two drafts (along with server discovery), why not just reference them? I suppose we'll learn more as we go...



> On Apr 2, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Danny,
> 
> Makes sense to me to just reference TGC TNC IF-IMC and IF-IMV specs.
> 
> Cheers,
> - Ira
> 
> 
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic <http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>
> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc <http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>
> mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com <mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
> Jan-April: 579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
> May-Dec: PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Haynes Jr., Dan <dhaynes@mitre.org <mailto:dhaynes@mitre.org>> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> The current ECP draft (-01) calls out the TCG IF-IMC [1] and IF-IMV [2] specifications which serve as interfaces between Posture Collectors and the Posture Broker Client and Posture Validators and the Posture Broker Server respectively.
> 
>  
> 
> At IETF 101, we proposed that we would like to just continue pointing to the TCG documents rather than submit them to SACM. The group in the room seemed amenable to that idea.
> 
>  
> 
> As a result, we wanted to follow-up and get confirmation on the list that this approach was reasonable and that there were no major objections.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Danny
> 
>  
> 
> [1] https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TNC_IFIMC_v1_3_r18.pdf <https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TNC_IFIMC_v1_3_r18.pdf>
> [2] https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TNC_IFIMV_v1_4_r11.pdf <https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TNC_IFIMV_v1_4_r11.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email