Re: [sacm] SACM - consensus on defining SACM terminology in a separate document

+1

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com>wrote:

> At the SACM WG meeting at IETF-87 the participants in the room did not
> raise any objection to the proposal to separate the terminology section
> from draft-waltermire-sacm-use-cases and make of it a separate document
> that defines the SACM terms in one place and can be referred by all other
> SACM documents. We are asking the WG to confirm this consensus on the mail
> list. Please send all comments, questions and concerns to the SACM WG mail
> list before 8/15.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Adam and Dan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>