IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Architecture Draft

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 14 July 2019 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA79120041 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FVrQ9zT_kC1M for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9A312006F for <sacm@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id h59so9421636otb.10 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=azConqGo/jsIvbec2m3Uw++NsFjk3qk5sMSnLgtFhkA=; b=WnqNqO68RHVajQQA7vEZSetzp2a+Y89JBwlMOrdzXCbBvNU4ngLPiH/cloNQ/6zhz/ cmRqqg7+zfGXxLnFsY6wgWoiysLG0/BTvCA/uN/bag5qRncgIGq5X/38X4HUp4FPL8ul h2Gm7KMMIwz0ClDya0gfFDmiwRDb3D4I7XpObysKYwg9d5CVlgKvi/erjm6xW2JWgTRg iWZYla3j9jDYfTfHrFHdKMD+AFXQKlywHIAzfz4C+VQfXxZX55h2apMDZR6Hs9colv5i dIBUt1/jwiqiwyjDIexm6rl6ea3q3EBt0leytQIVK4YGKTsMltTeobXcFOD9Uk8Hio3B niNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=azConqGo/jsIvbec2m3Uw++NsFjk3qk5sMSnLgtFhkA=; b=C5ybLmuJK4qASxGJoY+9J0fg/tfIHGNxmJbDOq7GLpr0/08eyh4rxlrDTNf1WjRHdA LtSUJVyt1WxKjM2yAFb14sAr4mijR0h5gSgMkhtFlt6GMSWvy0l2rHw0sPkGRJgQLWWg yYQnd1ozI3Ru4V1Pztumx7lFB0J64klANJog1NNGz2gJp94LPse2/sLKE4MI+ULCwvYg mwgh9iElIXSH8wFZahMtA0bE276deSBU3Pudwh1+OKZH2Ov263U6Wpc6SjzvhMExj63p MxWo88zwLGcYLiIA5qHrPgMKq3FJTkuEDREhT9UqK/4wDFcVxM7Dj01pftJCOMz7VqQ6 m5Iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9MrybSFlg+BmpXDM60C1U2y3klTcUaE2RjaVQFsPvTD40MjPd G6GkXhhR/NfFieJmwOMKLlvgEz4nIAmoOsCIiR4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7EhcMI9bKSkTORzaI9j9E2853bUU6rPIvHUwmAxJa35HuAcEOjK3dlms1PcOg6/9BcGtM+eUc21z7elB9JIE=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76ce:: with SMTP id p14mr4603192otl.342.1563070582575; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8F0550DE-D31D-4C6A-BB97-6CEEF589E617@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F0550DE-D31D-4C6A-BB97-6CEEF589E617@gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 22:16:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5Q+4E34mOUXo4yPUgPAoE3y5eAH4mBQQQJdMiz71v8GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
Cc: "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d55835058d9aba5c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/pqJpnkrCStMnz_OdjH_Fql1unKE>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Architecture Draft
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 02:16:25 -0000

Hi Adam,

Thanks for raising the question to the list.  I just skimmed (and sorry if
I missed it) and am wondering how does ROLIE, SWIMA, and NEA fit into the
architecture?  Does this align with the SCAP 2.0 vision or does it diverge
(we don't have to follow NIST obviously, but it would be good to understand
the picture and if they do align, could or should.

Since the ECP draft has a reliance on NEA (and I think SWIMA, but will be
reading the ECP draft again this week), they are all part of the overall
architecture, right?  Having this picture of how these pieces fit and if
there are identified gaps would be very helpful to me, likely others as
well.

Thank you!
Kathleen

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:09 PM Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Greetings all:
>
> During the last virtual interim we talked about some of the next things we
> wanted to work on, and one of those is the current architecture draft. Per
> the notes, we would like this to be an item to discuss during our session
> in Montreal, and it seems like a good idea to have some discussion points
> ready before then. Our goal (again, as stated in the notes) is to drive the
> direction of the draft to conclusion.
>
> What needs to be done with the draft to get there?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Adam
>
> 2019-06-25 VI Notes:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2019-sacm-02-201906251300/
>
> SACM Architecture 01:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email